Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
1,779 results for '* court:"Delaware Superior Court"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-08-06
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Construction | Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Robinson
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard E. Berl, Jr., Hudson, Jones, Jaywork & Fisher, LLC, Lewes, DE for petitioner.
for defendant: Daniel A. Griffith, Thomas Wallace, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLC, Wilmington, DE for respondents.
Case Number: S22C-11-016 RHR
Court remanded denial of rezoning application where city commissioners failed to adequately explain the legal reasons for denying the application.
Publication Date: 2024-07-30
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Real Estate
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Travis S. Hunter, Alexandra M. Ewing, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Douglas D. Herrmann, Emily L. Wheatley, Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, Wilmington, DE; R. Thomas Avery, Stephen M. Hoeplinger, Capes, Sokol, Goodman & Sarachan, P.C., St. Louis, MO for defendants.
Case Number: N23C-10-136 EMD CCLD
LLC member's capital contributions were not "losses" under the parties' guaranty as treating them as losses would effectively force the other members to make capital contributions for which the first member would receive a greater ownership stake.
Publication Date: 2024-07-30
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Health Care | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Rennie
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Carmella P. Keener, Cooch and Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE; David W. Asp, Joseph C. Bourne, R. David Hahn, Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, MN; Anne T. Regan, Nathan D. Prosser, Hellmuth & Johnson PLLC, Edina, MN for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Emily V. Burton, Cheol W. Park, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jan M. Conlin, Heather M. McElroy, Patrick A. Cochran, Ciresi Conlin LLP, Minneapolis, MN for defendant.
Case Number: N23C-09-005 SKR CCLD
Forward-looking projection could constitute actionable fraud where plaintiffs adequately alleged that the projection was a complete fabrication as defendants lacked the data necessary to calculate a reasonable projection and thus likely fabricated the figures underpinning the projection.
Publication Date: 2024-07-30
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen B. Brauerman, Emily L. Skaug, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Joelle E. Polesky, Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Patrick K. Kingsley, Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP, Philadelphia, PA for defendant.
Case Number: N23C-08-096 EMD CCLD
Express terms of parties' supply agreement released supplier from having to honor rates under the agreement after its termination, and the agreement merely allowed purchaser to apply credits it had earned to future contracts negotiated between the parties.
Publication Date: 2024-07-23
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Distribution and Wholesale | Pharmaceuticals
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas E. Hanson, Jr., Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Wilmington, DE; Eric Sussman, Denise Lazar, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Chicago, IL for plaintiffs.
for defendant: John M. Seaman, Florentina D. Field, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Travis S. Hunter, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Michael J. Payne, Frankel, Rubin, Klein, Payne & Pudlowski, P.C., St. Louis, MO for defendants.
Case Number: N23C-09-011 EMD CCLD
Buyers waived their fraud claims against sellers by averring in a subsequent letter agreement that buyers' losses arose from sellers' breaches of representations and warranties, and buyers failed to file an indemnity lawsuit within the applicable survival period.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-07-23
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Insurance
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Wallace
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Geoffrey G. Grivner, Kody M. Sparks, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, Wilmington, DE; Benjamin N. Gluck, Oliver Rocos, Barr Benyamin, Bird Marella LLP, Los Angeles, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Alexandra M. Cummings, Sara Carnahan, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Scott C. Solberg, Gregory M. Schweizer, Caroline P. Malone, Eimer Stahl LLP, Chicago, IL for defendants.
Case Number: N24C-01-006 PRW CCLD
Court allowed plaintiff to pursue breach of contract and implied covenant claims alternatively where there were factual disputes over whether defendant had retracted its repudiation and which remedy plaintiff elected in response to defendant's actions.
Publication Date: 2024-07-16
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Industry: Food and Beverage | Investments and Investment Advisory | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Brennan
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Andrew L. Cole, Stacy L. Newman, Michael E. Fitzpatrick, Nathaniel J. Klepser, Cole Schotz PC, Wilmington, DE; J. Michael Pardoe, Cole Schotz PC, Baltimore, MD for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Marc Casarino, Katie Barksdale, Kennedys CMK LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: N23C-02-086 DJB
Investment fraud claims failed where alleged misrepresentations did not constitute actionable fraud and plaintiffs could not plead justifiable reliance due to their failure as sophisticated parties to conduct due diligence into the company's financials and business operations.
Publication Date: 2024-07-16
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Adams
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stamatios Stamoulis, Richard C. Weinblatt, Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC, Wilmington, DE; Richard A. Schwartz, Ross LLP, Los Angeles, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: John P. DiTomo, Alec F. Hoeschel, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Brian J. Massengill, Matthew E. Fenn, Mayer Brown LLP, Chicago, IL for defendant.
Case Number: N23C-08-206 MAA CCLD
Claims connected to the process of calculation and payment fell within scope of parties' limited arbitration clause covering the calculation of payment for acquired company following post-closing true-up.
Publication Date: 2024-07-16
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Advertising | Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Adams
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Andrew D. Cordo, Andrew D. Berni, Joshua A. Manning, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Berton W. Ashman, Jr., Jesse L. Noa, Justin T. Hymes, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael J. Baratz, Patrick F. Linehan, Steptoe LLP, Washington, DC for defendants.
Case Number: N23C-04-021 MAA CCLD
Court granted judgment to enforce promissory note where affirmative defenses/counterclaims of fraud failed as plaintiff was not the principal of company officers who allegedly misrepresented company sales numbers.
Publication Date: 2024-07-09
Practice Area: Insurance Law
Industry: Insurance
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Rennie
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jennifer C. Wasson, Carla M. Jones, Ryan D. Kingshill, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Brook Roberts, Drew Gardiner, Christine Rolph, James Tabb, Jessica England, Paula Moura, Latham & Watkins LLP, San Diego, CA & New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Bruce E. Jameson, John G. Day, Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Tammy Yuen, Rebecca Amdursky, Amber Locklear, Skarzynski Marick & Black LLP, New York, NY; Marc S. Casarino, Karine Sarkisian, Gary S. Kull, Kennedys CMK LLP, Wilmington, DE & Basking Ridge, NJ for defendants.
Case Number: N23C-03-009 SKR CCLD
Court denied motion to compel discovery to the extent that discovery requests sought documents irrelevant to the case or communications protected by attorney-client privilege.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read