• In re Dell Tech., Inc. Class V Stockholders Litig.

    Publication Date: 2024-08-27
    Practice Area: Corporate Governance
    Industry: Electronics | Investments and Investment Advisory | Software
    Court: Delaware Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Seitz
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen B. Brauerman, Sarah T. Andrade, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE for appellant.
    for defendant: Ned Weinberger, Mark Richardson, Brendan W. Sullivan, Labaton Sucharow LLP, Wilmington, DE; Domenico Minerva, Joseph Cotilletta, Labaton Sucharow LLP, New York, NY; David M. Cooper, Silpa Maruri, George T. Phillips, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY; William R. Sears, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Peter B. Andrews, Craig J. Springer, David M. Sborz, Jackson E. Warren, Andrews & Springer LLC, Wilmington, DE; Chad Johnson, Noam Mandel, Desiree Cummings, Robert Gerson, Jonathan Zweig, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, New York, NY; Jeremy S. Friedman, David F.E. Tejtel, Christopher M. Windover, Lindsay La Marca, Friedman Oster & Tejtel PLLC, Bedford Hills, NY for appellee.

    Case Number: 349, 2023

    Court upheld counsel fee of 26 percent of $1 billion settlement where Delaware disfavored per se rules governing reasonableness of fee awards and chancery court adequately explained the reasonable value of the award.

  • In re COVID-Related Restrictions on Religious Serv.

    Publication Date: 2024-08-13
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: Non-Profit | State and Local Government
    Court: Delaware Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice LeGrow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen J. Neuberger, Thomas S. Neuberger, The Neuberger Firm, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Thomas C. Crumplar, Jacobs & Crumplar, P.A., Wilmington, DE for appellants.
    for defendant: Zi-Xiang Shen, Zachary S. Stirparo, State of Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE for appellee.

    Case Number: 354, 2023

    Suit challenging the constitutionality of COVID-19 restrictions on houses of worship filed months after such restrictions were lifted was not a justiciable controversy, and state officials were immune from damages for any constitutional violations where they exercised their discretion to impose the conditions in a good faith effort to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • Exit Strategy, LLC v. Festival Retail Fund BH, L.P.

    Publication Date: 2024-08-06
    Practice Area: Corporate Governance
    Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Real Estate | Retail
    Court: Delaware Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice LeGrow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David A. Jenkins, Jason Z. Miller, Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE for appellant.
    for defendant: Douglas D. Herrmann, James H.S. Levine, Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andrew W. Zepeda, Lurie, Zepeda, Schmalz, Hogan & Martin, Los Angeles, CA for appellee.

    Case Number: 318, 2023

    Special limited partner was not entitled to distribution from sale of partnership's primary asset where partnership was entitled to deduct defeasance costs to satisfy the mortgage to sell the property as a "loan interest cost."

  • Kellner v. AIM ImmunoTech Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-07-23
    Practice Area: Corporate Governance
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: Delaware Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Seitz
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John M. Seaman, Eliezer Y. Feinstein, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Teresa Goody Guillén, Richard Raile, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Washington, DC; Marco Molina, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Costa Mesa, CA; Alexandra L. Trujillo, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Houston, TX for appellant.
    for defendant: William R. Denny, Matthew F. Davis, Nicholas D. Mozal, Caneel Radinson-Blasucci, Eric J. Nascone, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Stefan Atkinson, Mary T. Reale, Mason E. Reynolds, Joseph Taglienti, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY; Michael F. Williams, Don Hong, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington DC for appellees.

    Case Number: 3, 2024

    Court refused to enforce facially valid amended bylaws where board adopted them primarily to thwart stockholders' efforts to nominate opposing candidates to board.

  • Albence v. Mennella

    Publication Date: 2024-07-16
    Practice Area: Election and Political Law
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: Delaware Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Traynor
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kathleen Jennings, Attorney General of the State of Delaware, Alexander S. Mackler, Patricia A. Davis, Kenneth Wan, Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE; Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., Ginger D. Anders, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Washington, DC for appellants.
    for defendant: M. Jane Brady, Brady Legal Group LLC, Lewes, DE; Noel H. Johnson, Public Interest Legal Foundation, Alexandria, VA for appellees.

    Case Number: 120, 2024

    Plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge voting procedures where one was not a candidate in the upcoming election cycle and the other's role as inspector of elections did not implicate the challenged procedures.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Lancaster County & Berks County Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Fowler v. Perdue, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-07-09
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: Food and Beverage | Manufacturing
    Court: Delaware Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Valihura
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Walt F. Schmittinger, Schmittinger and Rodriguez, P.A., Dover, DE for appellant.
    for defendant: Andrea C. Panico, Megan E. Murray, Tybout, Redfearn & Pell, Wilmington, DE for appellee.

    Case Number: 412, 2023

    COVID-19 was not an occupational disease where the risk of getting sick was not a peculiar risk of the worker's employment or work environment but rather was a general risk faced by all workers.

  • Riad v. Brandywine Valley SPCA, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-07-02
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Non-Profit
    Court: Delaware Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Traynor
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William D. Fletcher, Jr., Dianna E. Stuart, Schmittinger & Rodriguez, P.A., Dover, DE for appellant.
    for defendant: Kevin J. Connors, Marshall Dennehey, P.C., Wilmington, DE for appellee.

    Case Number: 249, 2023

    Dog bite statute contained no language indicating the legislature's intent to exclude animal welfare organizations from the definition of an "owner."

  • Ferrellgas Partners L.P. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 2024-06-25
    Practice Area: Insurance Law
    Industry: Cargo and Shipping | Energy | Insurance
    Court: Delaware Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Valihura
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David J. Baldwin, Peter McGivney, Berger Harris LLP, Wilmington, DE; Brent W. Vincent, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, Chicago, IL for appellants.
    for defendant: Bruce W. McCullough, Bodell Bove, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Louis A. Bové, Bodell Bove, LLC, Philadelphia, PA for appellee.

    Case Number: N19C-05-275

    Trial court correctly determined that insurance policy unambiguously excluded coverage for wrongful acts that occurred after the coverage period, as the policy's run-off exclusion merely allowed claimant to file a covered claim after the policy period expired.

  • NGL Energy Partners LP v. LCT Capital, LLC

    Publication Date: 2024-06-11
    Practice Area: Contracts
    Industry: Consulting | Energy
    Court: Delaware Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Traynor
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Steven T. Margolin, Lisa M. Zwally, Samuel L. Moultrie, Bryan T. Reed, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Hal S. Shaftel, Daniel Friedman, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, New York, NY for appellants.
    for defendant: John L. Reed, Peter H. Kyle, Daniel P. Klusman, DLA Piper LLP, Wilmington, DE; Benjamin D. Schuman, DLA Piper LLP, Baltimore, MD for appellee.

    Case Number: N15C-08-109

    Trial court erred in categorically excluding prejudgment interest from the post-judgment interest calculation where prejudgment interest was a component of the judgment.

  • BitGo Holdings, Inc. v. Galaxy Digital Holdings, Ltd.

    Publication Date: 2024-06-03
    Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
    Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Delaware Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Traynor
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: A. Thompson Bayliss, Michael A. Barlow, Eliezer Y. Feinstein, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; R. Brian Timmons, David M. Grable, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Los Angeles, CA; David Cooper, Deborah K. Brown, Nathan Goralnik, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY for appellants.
    for defendant: Bradley R. Aronstam, S. Michael Sirkin, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andrew Ditchfield, Brian M. Burnovski, Pascale Bibi, Kyra Macy Kaufman, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, NY; Neal Kumar Katyal, Nathaniel A.G. Zelinsky, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, D.C., Dennis H. Tracey, III, Hogan Lovells US LLP, New York, NY for appellees.

    Case Number: 2022-0808

    Court remanded for reconsideration of interpretation of contractual requirement using extrinsic evidence where both parties proffered reasonable interpretations of the provision.