Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
210 results for '* judge:"District Judge Andrews"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2020-01-29
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Energy
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Deborah J. Mayhan, New Castle, DE, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: Barry M. Klayman, Abigail M. Green and Daniel V. Johns, Cozen & O’Connor for defendant.
Case Number: D68859
Plaintiff signed an arbitration agreement at the commencement of her employment and the parties' dispute fell within the scope of that agreement.
Publication Date: 2020-01-08
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: R. Montgomery Donaldson and Christina B. Vavala, Polsinelli PC, Wilmington, DE; B. Trent Webb, Aaron E. Hankel, Ryan J. Schletzbaum, Ryan D. Dykal, Jordan T. Bergsten, Lauren E. Douville, Mark D. Schafer, Maxwell C. McGraw, Samuel J. LaRoque, Robert H. Reckers and Michael W. Gray, Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP, Kansas City, MO and Houston, TX for Sprint Communications.
for defendant: Kelly E. Farnan, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; David S. Benyacar, Daniel L. Reisner and Robert J. Ka-terberg, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, NY and Washington, DC; Gregory Arovas, Jeanne M. Heffernan, James E. Marina, Luke L. Dauchot and Bao Nguyen, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY, Los Angeles, CA and San Francisco, CA for Charter Communications. Steven J. Balick and Andrew C. Mayo, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Robinson Vu, Lindsay Volpenhein Cutié, Amy E. Bergeron and Timothy S. Durst, Baker Botts LLP, Houston, TX and Dallas, TX for Media-com Communications, WideOpenWest Networks, Atlantic Broadband Fin. and Grande Communications Networks. Phillip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa and Alan R. Silverstein, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Brian M. Buroker, Omar F. Amin, Jessica Altman and Robert Vincent, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, DC and Dallas, TX for Frontier Com-munications.
Case Number: D68836
The court construed patent terms relating to technology for making telephone calls over the internet.
Publication Date: 2020-01-08
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: Health Care | State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Anibal Melendez, Smyrna, DE, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: Dana Spring Monzo, White & Williams, Wilmington, DE for defendant Mills.
Case Number: D68835
An inmate's complaint for civil rights violations failed to state any personal involvement on the part of one defendant, so the court dismissed that claim and allowed plaintiff to amend.
Publication Date: 2020-01-01
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Electronics | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen B. Brauerman and Sara E. Bussiere, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Mark S. Raskin, Robert A. Whitman, Michael S. De Vincenzo, John F. Petrsoric, and Andrea Pacelli, Mishcon De Reya New York LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld and Jennifer Ying, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael Brody and Jonathan Retsky, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL; David P. Enzminger, Winston & Strawn LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Krishnan Padmanabhan, Winston & Strawn LLP, New York, NY; James Lin, Winston & Strawn LLP, Menlo Park, CA for defendant.
Case Number: D68823
Expert opinion regarding written description and enablement excluded where the expert focused on the accused technologies and failed to analyze whether the specifications sufficiently described the patent claims.
Publication Date: 2019-12-25
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David E. Moore, Bindu A. Palapura and Stephanie E. O’Byrne, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wil-mington, DE; Steven Yovits, Mark Scott, Clifford Katz and Malavika Rao, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Chicago, IL for plaintiff.
for defendant: Kelly E. Farnan, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Sten Jensen, Clement Seth Roberts and Alyssa Caridis, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, San Francisco, CA and Los Angeles, CA for defendant.
Case Number: D68817
Plaintiff's patents contained inventive concepts that were directed to address known issues, so they were not simply abstract ideas.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: SHARI L. KLEVENS, ALANNA G. CLAIR
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2019-12-25
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David A. Felice, Gregory Y. Porter, Patrick Muench and Ryan T. Jenny, Bailey & Glasser, LLP, Wilming-ton, DE and Washington, D.C.; Daniel Feinberg and Todd Jackson, Feinberg, Jackson, Worthman & Wasow LLP, Berkeley, CA for plaintiff.
for defendant: Albert H. Manwaring, IV, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael J. Prame, Edward J. Meehan and Ross P. McSweeney, Groom Law Group, Washington, D.C. for defendant.
Case Number: D68818
Plaintiff met the ascertainability, numerosity and adequacy of representation requirements for a class action.
Publication Date: 2019-12-11
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stamatios Stamoulis and Richard C. Weinblatt, Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC, Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs. Wendy Verland and Jeffrey D. Ahdoot, Blackbird Technologies, Boston, MA for plaintiff Blackbird Tech LLC. Thomas C. Grimm and Jeremy A. Tigan, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE
for defendant: Ronald F. Lopez and Jennifer Hayes, Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco, CA and Los Angeles, CA for Sierra Wireless defend-ants. Jack B. Blumenfeld and Rodger D. Smith II, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; David Loewenstein and Clyde A. Shuman, Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer, Wilmington, DE for defendant Telit Wireless Solutions.
Case Number: D68804
In this patent claim construction matter, the court concluded that a preamble could be limiting, and a prior statement was not sufficiently specific to qualify as a prosecution history disclaimer.
Publication Date: 2019-12-04
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Alfred R. Terry, Georgetown, DE, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant:
Case Number: D68795
Governmental entities named in this civil rights suit were entitled to immunity, and the complaint failed to allege personal in-volvement on the part of the individual defendants. Complaint dismissed, with leave to amend.
Publication Date: 2019-11-27
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Counsel: David H. Williams, James H. McMackin, III and Allyson Britton DiRocco, Morris James, LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: James D. Taylor, Jr. and Christina D. Riggs, Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr, LLP, Wilmington, DE and Philadelphia, PA for defendants.
Case Number: D68785
In this employment discrimination case, plaintiffs failed to show that defendants' reasons for terminating their employment were pretextual. Summary judgment granted in favor of defendants.
Publication Date: 2019-11-27
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kelly E. Farnan and Katharine L. Mowery, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Lawrence J. Gotts, Kevin L. Mallen and Gabriel S. Gross, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, New York, NY and Menlo Park CA; Stephanie N. Solomon, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY; David S. Benyacar, Daniel L. Reisner, Maxwell C. Preston and Michael J. Block, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: R. Montgomery Donaldson and Christina B. Vavala, Polsinelli PC, Wilmington, DE; B. Trent Webb, Christine A. Guastello, Jordan T. Bergsten, Colman D. McCarthy, David Morehan and Gary M. Miller, Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP, Kansas City, MO, Houston, TX and Chicago, IL for defendants.
Case Number: D68788
In the claim construction for this patent case involving wireless services, the court relied on the plain meaning of the term and the context of the claim language.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read