• British Telecomm. plc v. Fortinet Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-01-08
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip A. Rovner and Jonathan A. Choa, Potter, Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; James H. Shalek, Baldassare Vinti, Nolan M. Goldber, and Fabio E. Tarud, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld and Brian P. Egan, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; John Neukom and James Y. Pak, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Palo Alto, CA for defendant.

    Case Number: D68831

    Motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds pursuant to an exclusive forum selection agreement denied where it was not clear that plaintiffs would be able to assert their U.S. patent infringement claims in the required foreign court.

  • McNeill v. Snow

    Publication Date: 2020-01-08
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: Health Care | State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Dale Kevin McNeill, pro se plaintiff.
    for defendant: Ryan Patrick Connell,Delaware Dep’t of Justice, Wilmington, DE for defendant Wesley. Dana Spring Monzo and Karine Sarkisian, White & Williams, Wilmington, DE for defendant Connections CSP Inc.

    Case Number: D68834

    An inmate failed to adequately state a claim for violations of his civil rights, because the record did not show any personal in-volvement by the warden or any unlawful policy by a health care provider.

  • Super Interconnect Tech. LLC v. HP Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-01-01
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Consumer Products | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian Farnan and Michael Farnan , Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jeffrey Bragalone, Jonathan Rastegar and T. William Ken-nedy, Bragalone Conroy P.C., Dallas, TX for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Jack Blumenfeld and Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Cory Davis, Theresa Weisenberger, Daniel Goettle and Jennifer Kurcz, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Atlanta, GA, Philadelphia, PA and Chicago, IL for defendant.

    Case Number: D68827

    Plaintiff failed to provide fair notice of how defendant's accused products directly infringed on plaintiff's patents, and because the court concluded plaintiff did not adequately allege direct infringement, it could not recover for induced infringement either.

  • United States v. Dougherty

    Publication Date: 2020-01-01
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeffrey A. Finucane, assistant United States attorney, Martinsburg, WV for plaintiff.
    for defendant: N/A

    Case Number: D68829

    Where defendant filed multiple incoherent motions, the court ordered a psychological evaluation to determine defendant's competency.

  • Orexo AB v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC

    Publication Date: 2019-12-25
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Pharmaceuticals
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Derek J. Fahnestock, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Errol B. Taylor, Fredrick, M. Zullow, Anna Brook, Jordan P. Markham, Kyanna Lewis, Nathaniel T. Browand and Venus Allahyarzadeh, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: John C. Phillips, Jr. and David A. Bilson, Phillips, Goldman, McCaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE; George C. Lombardi, Michael K. Nutter, Ivan M. Poullaos, John R. McNair and Nimalka R. Wickramasek-era, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL and Los Angeles, CA for defendant.

    Case Number: D68820

    The court properly excluded evidence relating to prior litigation which involved a different pharmaceutical.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    District of Columbia Legal Malpractice Law 2024

    Authors: Shari L. Klevens, Alanna G. Clair

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Boston Scientific Corp. v. Nevro Corp.

    Publication Date: 2019-12-11
    Practice Area: Intellectual Property
    Industry: Health Care | Manufacturing
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Karen L. Pascale and Pilar G. Kraman, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP, Wilmington, DE; Matthew M. Wolf, Edward Han, Marc A. Cohn, Amy DeWitt, Krista M. Carter and Thomas T. Carmack, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington DC and Palo Alto, CA for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Rodger D. Smith and Michael J. Flynn, Morris Nichols, Arsht & Tunnel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Bradford J. Badke, Ching-Lee Fukuda, Ketan V. Patel, Thomas A. Broughan III, Sharon Lee and Benjamin H. Huh, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY and Washington, DC for defendant.

    Case Number: D68801

    The court granted a motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim for tortious interference with contract and all but one of its patent in-fringement claims.

  • Abbatiello v. Metzger

    Publication Date: 2019-12-11
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Anthony A. Abbatiello, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, Smyrna, DE, pro se plaintiff.
    for defendant: N/A

    Case Number: D68799

    Plaintiff's pro se civil rights complaint could proceed where plaintiff had alleged cognizable Eighth Amendment and due process claims against prison officials.

  • Jones v. Pierce

    Publication Date: 2019-12-11
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael L. Jones, Dallas, PA, pro se plaintiff. Ryan Patrick Connell, Delaware Dep’t of Justice, Wilmington, DE for defendant Pierce.
    for defendant: Dana Spring Monzo and Lindsey E. Imbrogno, White & Williams, Wilmington, DE for defendants Gant-Major and Krafcik.

    Case Number: D68803

    The court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants in this civil rights matter, because plaintiff failed to show that defendants' conduct amounted to deliberate indifference to plaintiff's medical needs while he was an inmate.

  • DeJesus v. State

    Publication Date: 2019-11-27
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel C. Herr, Law Office of Daniel C. Herr LLC, Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs
    for defendant: Joseph C. Handlon and Ryan P. Connell, Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE for defendants.

    Case Number: D68784

    Corrections officers entitled to qualified immunity in deliberate indifference case where record did not support finding that inmate had particular vulnerability to suicide or that officers knew or should have known of such vulnerability.

  • MarkDutchCo 1 B.V. v. Zeta Interactive Corp.

    Publication Date: 2019-11-27
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Software
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William M. Lafferty, John P. DiTomo and Zi-Xiang Shen, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Stephen M. Juris and Alexandra Verdi, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Patricia A. Winston, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE; John Du Wors and Nathan Durrance, Newman Du Wors Durrance LLP, Seattle, WA for defendant.

    Case Number: D68786

    Plaintiff's breach of contract claim was ripe for judicial adjudication, and the court exercised its discretion to deny defendant's request for a stay pending the outcome of a foreign arbitration. Motion to dismiss denied.