Filter This View

  • City of Detroit Police & Fire Ret. Sys. v. Hamrock

    Publication Date: 2021-03-24
    Practice Area: Corporate Governance
    Industry: Energy | Investments and Investment Advisory
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Carmella P. Keener, Cooch and Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Daniel S. Sommers, Joshua Handelsman, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Washington, DC; Richard A. Speirs, Amy Miller, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, New York, NY; Kip B. Shuman, Shuman, Glenn & Stecker, San Francisco, CA; Rusty E. Glenn, Shuman, Glenn & Stecker, Denver, CO; Brett D. Stecker, Shuman, Glenn & Stecker, Ardmore, PA; Ronald A. King, Clark Hill PLC, Lansing, MI for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Gregory P. Williams, Raymond J. DiCamillo, Katharine L. Mowery, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Walter C. Carlson, Nilofer Umar, Caroline A. Wong, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL for defendants.
    Case Number: D69335

    Derivative claim of breach of loyalty dismissed where demand was not excused as plaintiff failed to show that directors were likely to face liability on underlying claim and therefore could not be disinterested and independent.

  • United States v. Punter

    Publication Date: 2021-01-13
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David C. Weiss, Maureen McCartney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Wilmington, DE for the state.
    for defendant: Edson A. Bostic, Janet Bateman, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
    Case Number: D69260

    The court denied defendant's motion for release from pre-trial detention because none of the factors jus-tifying his detention had changed, and defendant did not provide a viable release plan.

  • Knights of Columbus Star of the Sea Council 7297 v. City of Rehoboth Beach

    Publication Date: 2020-12-30
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: Non-Profit | State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael P. Morton, Robert J. Valihura, Jr., David C. Zerbato, Morton, Valihura & Zerbato, LLC, Greenville, DE; Christopher DiPompeo, Kaytlin L. Roholt, Jones Day, Washington, DC; Roger Byron, First Liberty Institute, Plano, TX for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Max B. Walton, Lisa R. Hatfield, Brandon R. Harper, Connolly Gallagher LLP, Newark, DE; Daniel A. Griffith, Whiteford Taylor & Preston LLC, Wilmington, Delaware for defendants.
    Case Number: D69240

    Preliminary injunction on city policy banning private displays on public property denied where city revised the policy to address plaintiff's concerns and plaintiff did not challenge the revised policy.

  • Winter v. Richman

    Publication Date: 2020-12-09
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paul J. Lockwood and Stefania A. Rosca, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: George T. Lees III, Delaware Dep’t of Justice, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
    Case Number: D69221

    State law did not provide a private right of action for alleged violations of the state's constitution, so the court dismissed those claims but denied the other aspects of the motion to dismiss.

  • United States v. Stanford

    Publication Date: 2020-12-02
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David C. Weiss, Michael F. McTaggart, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Dist. of Delaware, Wilmington, DE for the government.
    for defendant: Edson A. Bostic, David L. Pugh, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
    Case Number: D69213

    The court denied defendant's motion to suppress because the warrant was supported by probable cause.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Chester County Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • United States v. Foster

    Publication Date: 2020-11-25
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David C. Weiss, Graham L. Robin, U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Delaware, Wilmington, DE for the government.
    for defendant: Peter A. Levin, Philadelphia, PA for defendant.
    Case Number: D69205

    The court denied defendant's motions to dismiss, suppress, compel the production of documents, and limit certain evidence at trial.

  • SLF Holdings, LLC v. Uniti Fiber Holdings, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-11-18
    Practice Area: Securities Litigation
    Industry: E-Commerce | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen B. Brauerman, Emily A. Letcher, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Edward S. Sledge IV, Dylan C. Black, Zachary A. Madonia, Emily M. Ruzic, Stanley E. Blackmon, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Bir-mingham, AL for plaintiff.
    for defendant: John P. DiTomo, Sabrina M. Hendershot, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jerome E. Speegle, Anthony M. Hoffman, Speegle, Hoffman, Holman & Holifield, LLC, Mobile, AL; Blake Rohrbacher, Kelly E. Farnan, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Edmund Polubinski III, Brian M. Burnovski, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
    Case Number: D69196

    The court granted defendants' motions to dismiss plaintiff's federal securities and state law claims.

  • 3G Licensing, S.A. v. Blackberry Ltd.

    Publication Date: 2020-11-04
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Lexie G. White, Hunter Vance, Susman Godfrey, LLP, Houston, TX; Andreas C. Healy, Jenna G. Farleigh, Susman Godfrey, LLP, Seattle, WA for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: John V. Gorman, Amy M. Dudash, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Eric Kraeutler, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Philadelphia, PA; Robert C. Bertin, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Washington, DC; John W. Shaw, Nathan R. Hoeschen, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; Yar R. Chaikovsky, Bruce Yen, Alexander H. Lee, Radhesh Devendran, Paul Hastings LLP, Palo Alto, CA; Jack B. Blumenfeld, Stephen J. Kraftschik, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Taylor Ludlam, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Raleigh, NC: Steven D. Moore; Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, San Francisco, CA; Russel A. Korn, Richard W. Goldstucker, Courtney S. Dabbiere, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, Atlanta, GA for defendants.
    Case Number: D69174

    Defendants' motion for summary judgment on patent infringement claims denied where evidence could allow jury to find that patents-in-suit were directed to patentable subject matter and that the accused products infringed upon the patent claims under the doctrine of equivalents.

  • Citrix Sys., Inc. v. Workspot, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-10-21
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Denise S. Kraft, Brian A. Biggs, Erin E. Larson, DLA Piper LLP (US), Wilmington, DE; Michael G. Strapp, Larissa Bifano, Safraz Ishmael, DLA Piper LLP (US), Boston, MA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Steven J. Balick, Andrew C. Mayo, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Ronald F. Lopez, Nixon Peabody LLP, San Francisco, CA; Jennifer Hayes, Nixon Peabody LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Matthew A. Weber, Angelo Christopher, Nixon Peabody LLP, Chicago IL for defendant.
    Case Number: D69159

    Additional monetary sanctions and striking of equitable defenses ordered against defendant who submitted declaration known to the declarant to be materially false, when defendant failed to conduct a diligent investigation into the declaration and failed to promptly withdraw the declaration upon indications the declaration might have been false.

  • Parkell v. Lyons

    Publication Date: 2020-09-23
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James S. Green, Sr., Seitz, Van Ogtrop & Green, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Stephen M. Ferguson, Ryan P. Connell, Dep’t of Justice, Wilmington, DE for defendants and the state.
    Case Number: D69131

    The court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment where an inmate failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit.