Filter This View

  • Power Integrations, Inc. v. Silanna Semiconductor N. Am., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-08-05
    Practice Area: Business Torts
    Industry: Electronics | Recruitment and Staffing
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John W. Shaw, Karen E. Keller and David M. Fry, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; David J. Miclean and Limin Zheng, Miclean Gleason LLP, San Mateo, CA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Philip A. Rovner and Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Micha Danzig and Paul M. Huston, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo P.C., San Diego, CA for defendant.
    Case Number: D69059

    Plaintiff failed to state a claim for misappropriation of trade secrets, but the complaint adequately alleged claims for interference with contractual relations and with prospective economic advantage.

  • Power Integrations, Inc. v. Silanna Semiconductor N. Am., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-07-22
    Practice Area: Business Torts
    Industry: Electronics | Recruitment and Staffing
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John W. Shaw, Karen E. Keller and David M. Fry, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; David J. Miclean and Limin Zheng, Miclean Gleason LLP, San Mateo, CA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Philip A. Rovner and Jonathan A. Choa, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Micha Danzig and Paul M. Huston, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo P.C., San Diego, CA for defendant.
    Case Number: D69059

    Plaintiff failed to state a claim for misappropriation of trade secrets, but the complaint adequately alleged claims for interference with contractual relations and with prospective economic advantage.

  • Bowman v. Barclays Bank of Delaware

    Publication Date: 2020-06-10
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: Financial Services and Banking
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Raeann Warner, Jacobs & Crumplar, P.A., Wilmington, DE; James A. Lewis and Jessica Ellis, Pennington Law Group, South Orange, NJ for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Adam V. Orlacchio, Blank Rome LLP, Wilmington, DE; Mark Blondman and Asima J. Ahmad, Blank Rome LLP, Philadelphia, PA for defendant.
    Case Number: D69007

    Defendant plausibly acted as plaintiff's employer where it had authority to control plaintiff's salary, means and manner of work, and direct plaintiff's termination from employment.

  • Lopez v. Bamaca

    Publication Date: 2020-05-06
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gary R. Spritz, Gary R. Spritz, Esq., Wilmington, DE for father.
    for defendant: Susan E. Morrison, Brandon J. Pakkebier and Daniel A. Taylor, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wilmington, DE for mother.
    Case Number: D68970

    Father established that he was exercising his custodial rights with respect to his minor daughter at the time mother removed the child to the United States. The court ordered mother to return the child to Mexico under the Child Abduction Remedies Act.

  • Koninklijke KPN N.V. v. Sierra Wireless, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-04-29
    Practice Area: Intellectual Property
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan and Joseph J. Farnan, Jr., Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andres C. Healy, Susman Godfrey LLP, Seattle, WA; Lexie G. White, Hunter A. Vance, Alejandra C. Salinas, Jeffrey S. David and Rocco Magni, Susman Godfrey LLP, Houston, TX for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld and Jeremy A. Tigan, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Adam Alper, Reza Do-khanchy, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, San Francisco, CA; Michael W. De Vries, Christopher M. Lawless and JB Schiller, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Los Angeles, CA for defendant.
    Case Number: D68963

    Defendants failed to provide sufficient evidence to support its counterclaims, so the court granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Chester County Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • United States v. Sabre Corp.

    Publication Date: 2020-04-22
    Practice Area: Antitrust
    Industry: Federal Government | Technology Media and Telecom | Travel and Tourism
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David C. Weiss, Laura D. Hatcher, Shamoor Anis, United States Dep’t of Justice, Wilmington, DE; Julie S. Elmer, Scott A. Westrich, Sarah P. McDonough, Robert A. Lepore, Aaron Comenetz, Brian E. Hanna, Craig W. Conrath, Dylan M. Carson, Rachel A. Flipse, Michael T. Nash, Jeremy P. Evans, Vittorio Cottafavi, Seth J. Wiener, John A. Holler, Grant A. Bermann and Katherine A. Celeste, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Joseph O. Larkin, Veronica A. Bartholomew, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Wilmington, DE; Tara L. Reinhart, Steven C. Sunshine, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Washington, DC; Matthew M. Martino, Michael H. Meni-tove and Evan R. Kreiner, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NY for Sabre defendants. Daniel A. Mason, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Wilmington, DE; Kenneth A. Gallo, Jonathan S. Kanter, Joseph J. Bial and Daniel J. Howley, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Washington, DC for defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, LP.
    Case Number: D68956

    The government failed to demonstrate a relevant market in this case involving companies that provided airline booking ser-vices, so the court allowed the merger to proceed.

  • Cousins v. Dutton-McCormick

    Publication Date: 2020-03-18
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel R. Cousins, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, Smyrna, DE, pro se plaintiff.
    for defendant: Stuart B. Drowos, Deputy Attorney General, Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE, attorney for defendants.
    Case Number: D68911

    Motion to compel production of documents granted to the extent that correctional facility could conduct additional search for the duty roster for the section and timeframe in question in plaintiff's inmate's complaint.

  • Chang v. State of Delaware

    Publication Date: 2020-03-11
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Weih Steven Chang, Hockessin, DE, pro se plaintiff.
    for defendant: Rosamaria Tassone-DiNardo, First Assistant City Solicitor, City of Wilmington Law Department, Wilmington, DE for defendant city. Ryan P. Connell, Deputy Attorney General, Department of Justice, State of Delaware, Wilmington, DE for defendants State and stage agencies. Gary H. Kaplan and Art C. Aranilla, Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, Wilmington, DE for defendant Children’s Advocacy Center of Delaware.
    Case Number: D68902

    Rule 60 motion denied where plaintiff failed to identify facts previously unknown to him during the prior proceedings and where his unsubstantiated allegations of judicial bias did not warrant extraordinary relief.

  • Navarro v. Wal-Mart Assoc., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-03-04
    Practice Area: Employment Litigation
    Industry: Retail
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Nelson Navarro, Smyrna, DE, pro se plaintiff.
    for defendant: Lindsay Neinast, Littler Mendelson, P.C., Washington, DC for defendants.
    Case Number: D68898

    Plaintiff's administrative complaint regarding race discrimination did not encompass claims for retaliation or a hostile work environment.

  • SZ DJI Tech. Co., Ltd. v. Autel Robotics USA LLC

    Publication Date: 2020-01-01
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Aerospace | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Stark
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jody C. Barillare, Amy M. Dudash, Willard K. Tom, Jon R. Roellke, Ryan Kantor and Bradford A. Cangro, Morgan, Lewis & Boekius LLP, Wilmington, DE and Washington, DC; Kelly E. Farnan and Christine D. Haynes, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; David M. Farnum and Sherry X. Wu, Anova Law Group, PLLC, Sterling, VA for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Anne Shea Gaza, Robert M. Vrana and Samantha G. Wilson, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Tim-othy C. Bickham, John Caracappa, Jonathan B. Sallet, Scott M. Richey, Beau M. Goodrick, Andrew Xue and Michael Flynn-O’Brien, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Washington, DC and San Francisco, CA for defendants.
    Case Number: D68828

    In its claim construction ruling, the court rejected defendants' arguments regarding indefiniteness in this patent matter.