'Paragraph V Displaced Lathrop': High Court Mulls Sovereign Immunity Waiver Disputes
"Is it your read of Paragraph V, that Paragraph V expanded sovereign immunity to claims that it had never applied to before?," Presiding Justice Nels S. D. Peterson asked appellant counsel during oral arguments Wednesday.
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
What You Need to Know
Supreme Court of Georgia weighs whether implications of amended complaints on constitutional sovereign immunity waivers.
Justices heard oral arguments in two unaffiliated cases involving underlying zoning disputes Wednesday.
Appellant counsel with Holt Ney Zatcoff & Wasserman in Atlanta argued opposite appellee counsel with Powell & Edwards Attorneys at Law in Lawrenceville in the first oral argument.
Appellant counsel with the Cobb County Attorney's Office argued opposite appellee counsel with the Erramilli Law Group in Tucker in the second oral argument.
A pair of sovereign immunity appeals challenging whether Article I, Section II, Paragraph V of the Georgia Constitution prohibits amending complaints to cure failures to comply with requirements landed before the Supreme Court of Georgia for oral argument Wednesday.
While hearing arguments from opposing counsel involved in underlying Cobb and Walton county zoning disputes, justices honed in on whether the constitutional paragraph displaced existing case law that enabled individual capacity claims against officials.
Warbler Investments, LCC v. City of Social Circle
J. Scott Jacobson (left) and Scott E. Morris of Holt Ney Zatcoff & Wasserman in Atlanta. Courtesy photos
Want to continue reading? Become an ALM Digital Reader for Free!
Benefits of a Digital Membership
Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
Access to the entire ALM network of websites
Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas. View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team. View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same. View Now
Law.com Compass includes access to our exclusive industry reports, combining the unmatched expertise of our analyst team with ALM’s deep bench of proprietary information to provide insights that can’t be found anywhere else.
Law.com Compass delivers you the full scope of information, from the rankings of the Am Law 200 and NLJ 500 to intricate details and comparisons of firms’ financials, staffing, clients, news and events.