Filter This View

  • Pilcher v. Stribling

    Publication Date: 2006-04-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edwin Marger, Jasper, and Michael J. Puglise, Snellville, for appellant.
    for defendant: Paul L. Rosenthal Preston & Malcolm PC, Monroe, for appellees.
    Case Number: A05A2064

    Georgia's stalking statute, O.C.G.A. § 16-5-90 applied to a fire chief who engaged in incidents of verbal abuse, employment threats, belittling behavior and physical ass

  • Service Employees Int'l Union v. Perdue

    Publication Date: 2006-04-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Carley, George H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael E. Kramer Kramer & Patel LLC, John R. Myer, Atlanta, and Carol R. Golubock, Washington DC, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Bryan K. Webb and Kathleen T. Gosden, Assistant Attorneys General, Atlanta, for appellees.
    Case Number: S05A1634

    The amendments to O.C.G.A. § 45-20-2 15-defining "unclassified service" as that term relates to the State Merit System-do not violate Art. IV, Sec. III, Par. I b of Ga. Const. of

  • Collins v. State

    Publication Date: 2006-03-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Blackburn, G. Alan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mark B. Beberman, Lyons, for appellant.
    for defendant: William S. Askew, District Attorney, Swainsboro, and Tony A. May, Assistant District Attorney, Lyons, for appellee.
    Case Number: A06A0815

    The state failed to show that the defendant sold cocaine within 1,000 feet of a public housing project as it is defined in O.C.G.A. § 16-13-3

  • Chatman v. Mancill

    Publication Date: 2006-02-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hunstein, Carol W.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, and Paula K. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Stephen D. Pereira Thompson & Sweeny PC, Lawrenceville, for appellee.
    Case Number: S05A1862

    The rationale behind the opinion in Ryan v. Thomas, 261 Ga. 661 1991-that one member of the public defender's office could not reasonably be expected to assert or argue the ineffective assistance of

  • Morse v. State

    Publication Date: 2006-01-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Bernes, Debra
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William J. Mason, Columbus, for appellant.
    for defendant: John G. Conger, District Attorney, and Crawford L. Seals, Assistant District Attorney, Columbus, for appellee.
    Case Number: A05A1606

    The trial judge presumably did not consider improper matters in setting the defendant's sentence for failure to report a collision with an unattended vehicle, fleeing or attempting to elude an offi

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Wrongful Use of Civil Proceedings and Related Torts in Pennsylvania, Second Edition

    Authors: George Bochetto, David P. Heim, John A. O’Connell, Robert S. Tintner

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Sullivan v. State

    Publication Date: 2005-12-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hunstein, Carol W.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Donald F. Samuel, Edward T. M. Garland Garland, Samuel & Loeb PC, and Josh D. Moore Georgia Capital Defenders, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Paul L. Howard Jr., District Attorney, Anne E. Green, Christopher D. Helms, Assistant District Attorneys, and Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: S05A1140

    O.C.G.A. § 16-1-8 c bars a subsequent prosecution only if the prior federal prosecution was for a crime within the concurrent jurisdiction of the

  • Seay v. Roberts

    Publication Date: 2005-08-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Barnes, Anne Elizabeth
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: J. R. Seay, Thomasville, proceeded pro se. Richard A. Greenberg, Tallahassee, Fla., for appellee.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A05A1291

    The plaintiff's claim that the IRS failed to properly follow its own procedure in seizing his real property to satisfy delinquent taxes was ruled against him in a previous a

  • AdvancePCS v. Bauer

    Publication Date: 2005-07-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Phipps, Herbert E.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Susan W. Housen, Laurie W. Daniel Holland & Knight LLP, Eric G. Serron, Martin D. Schneiderman and Paul J. Ondrasik Jr. Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
    for defendant: . Kenneth I. Sokolov Fine & Block, Atlanta, Arthur S. Gold, Chicago, Ill., Eric Lee Lee & Amtzis PL, Boca Raton, Fla., Carlin J. Phillips and Andrew J. Garcia Phillips & Garcia LLP, North Dartmouth, Mass.
    Case Number: A05A0455

    There was no significant connection between class representative plaintiffs' claims that the defendants-pharmacy benefit companies and mail-order pharmacies-were unjustly enriched through misclassif

  • The Med. Ctr. of Central Ga. v. Landers

    Publication Date: 2005-07-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kevin B. Buice and Norah M. White Pursley Lowery Meeks LLP, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Stanley H. Friedman and Janna Martin Friedman & Martin, Savannah, for appellees.
    Case Number: A05A0194

    A physician performing an employment medical examination cannot be liable under OSHA for failing to advise the examinee of the results of the examination, since OSHA regulations create duties only w

  • The Med. Ctr. of Central Ga. v. Landers

    Publication Date: 2005-06-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kevin B. Buice and Norah M. White Pursley Lowery Meeks LLP, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Stanley H. Friedman and Janna Martin Friedman & Martin, Savannah, for appellees.
    Case Number: A05A0194

    A physician performing an employment medical examination cannot be liable under OSHA for failing to advise the examinee of the results of the examination, since OSHA regulations create duties only w