Filter This View

  • In the Interest of T. E. T.

    Publication Date: 2006-12-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sarah E. Riedel Banks & Riedel, and Stephanie D. Burton Public Defender's Office, Eastman, for appellant.
    for defendant: Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Shalen S. Nelson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, and Charles M. Johnson, Eastman, for appellee.
    Case Number: A06A1183

    The evidence, including the 's efforts to legitimate and visit the child, his purchase of a suitable home and his stable employment, did not support the juvenile court's determination that the

  • Putnam County v. Adams

    Publication Date: 2006-11-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Donald W. Huskins, Eatonton, for appellant.
    for defendant: Dorothy J. Adams and Francis N. Ford Adams & Ford LLP, Eatonton, for appellees.
    Case Number: A06A1136

    The client is presumptively entitled to have both open and closed files returned when the attorney's representation

  • Hammack v. Hammack

    Publication Date: 2006-10-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Thompson, Hugh P.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jean M. Kutner, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Thomas S. Bishop Cummings, Kelley & Bishop PC, Gainesville, for appellee.
    Case Number: S06A0762

    The trial court was authorized to hold a hearing on the husband's divorce petition and to enter a final judgment and decree of divorce, since 30 days passed from when the wife's answer was due under

  • Graivier v. Dreger & McClelland

    Publication Date: 2006-07-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Ruffin, John H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Frank J. Beltran and Douglas V. Chandler Beltran & Assocs., Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Johannes S. Kingma and Shannon M. Sprinkle Carlock, Copeland, Semler & Stair, Atlanta, for appellees.
    Case Number: A06A0093

    A jury question remained as to whether defendant attorney exercised ordinary care in preparing an LLC operating agreement for the first plaintiff and another doctor, who partnered to manage a surgic

  • Howe & Assocs. PC v. Daniels

    Publication Date: 2006-06-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Thompson, Hugh P.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Scott M. Stevens Howe & Assocs., Alpharetta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Tony A. Taylor Daniels & Taylor, Lawrenceville, for appellee.
    Case Number: S05G1913

    O.C.G.A. § 15-19-14 b prevents dismissal of a suit after settlement to defeat a valid attorney's fee

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Philadelphia County Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • In re Otuonye

    Publication Date: 2006-06-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Phipps, Herbert E.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Vincent C. Otuonye, Jonesboro, for appellant.
    for defendant: Charles A. Spahos, Solicitor General, and Gilbert A. Crosby Solicitor General's Office, McDonough, for appellee.
    Case Number: A06A0075

    The trial court was entitled to impose a fine in the amount of the appellant's earned fees, if any, as punishment for effectively holding the appellant in criminal contempt for failing to appear in

  • Winzer v. EHCA Dunwoody LLC

    Publication Date: 2006-03-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Steven G. Early, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Michael D. Robl Thomerson, Spears & Robl LLC, Decatur, for appellee.
    Case Number: A05A2049; A05A2179

    The Supreme Court's decision in Eckles v. Atlanta Technology Group, 267 Ga. 801 1997, which established that only a licensed attorney can represent a corporation in a proceeding in a court of record

  • Bulat v. Bulat

    Publication Date: 2006-02-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Sears, Leah Ward
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David M. Kupsky McKenney & Froelich, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Sandra H. Taylor, LaGrange, for appellee.
    Case Number: S05F1980

    The husband acquiesced to an informal procedure for determining his wife's attorneys fees in their divorce action, in which his wife would submit her request for attorneys' fees with an itemized bi

  • Kirschner & Venker PC v. Taylor & Martino PC

    Publication Date: 2006-02-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Barry B. McGough, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Baxter L. Davis Davis, Matthews & Quigley, and William U. Norwood III Pope, McGlamry, Kilpatrick & Morrison LLP, Atlanta, for appellees.
    Case Number: A05A2283

    The plaintiff had no cause of action for an equal share of a $1.5 million contingency fee, because the underlying client fired the plaintiff before any settlement was reached in his

  • Williams v. Cooper

    Publication Date: 2006-01-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Benham, Robert
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Rita T. Williams Williams & Assocs., Decatur, for appellant.
    for defendant: Robert J. Hunter Hunter, Weinstein & Somerstein LLC, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: S05A1949

    Attorneys' fees against one party's counsel in a domestic relations case could not stand because the attorney was not given an adequate hearing on the subject of the fees aw