Filter This View

  • Allgood Farm LLC v. Johnson

    Publication Date: 2002-09-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bobby L. Cook Cooke & Connelly, Summerville, Phillip A. Bradley & Sheryl L. McCalla McKenna, Long & Aldridge LLP, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Albert C. Palmour Jr. and Johnny R. Dennis Albert Palmour, Summerville, for appellees.
    Case Number: S02A0410

    Defendant did not have superior title in a case involving mineral rights to certain land because plaintiffs' mineral interests predated defendant's ownership of the land by nearly 100 years and defe

  • Clemons v. State

    Publication Date: 2002-09-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Blackburn, G. Alan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel B. Kane, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: J. Tom Morgan III, District Attorney, Robert M. Coker, Assistant District Attorney, and Benjamin M. First, Special Assistant District Attorney, Decatur, for appellee.
    Case Number: A02A1298

    Under the totality of the circumstances, the trial court did not reversibly err in denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence obtained during a warrant search of his house, even though the dete

  • Brannen/Goddard Co. v. Baker

    Publication Date: 2002-08-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Barnes, Anne Elizabeth
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Lewis E. Hassett, Jessica F. Pardi Morris, Manning & Martin LLP, Atlanta, and Perry A. Phillips, Marietta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . James L. Paul and Matthew J. McCoyd Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Martin, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A00A2395

    The Court of Appeals adopted the Supreme Court's judgment that a limited partnership's a nt to pay real estate commissions was strictly divisible for statute of limitation purposes because the

  • Ainsworth v Perreault

    Publication Date: 2002-08-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Mikell, Charles B.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John A. Howard Burr & Forman LLP, and Mark D. Gropp Wasson, Sours & Harris PC, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Bradley A. Hutchins and Robert J. Proctor Proctor & Chambers, Atlanta, for appellees.
    Case Number: A01A1898

    The sellers did not fraudulently conceal a defect in their home by failing to disclose prior satisfactory re

  • Unified Gov't of Athens-Clarke County, Ga. v. Watson

    Publication Date: 2002-08-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Pope, Marion T.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William C. Berryman Jr. McLeod, Benton, Lowery & Meeks, Athens, and Charles N. Pursley Jr. Pursley, Howell, Lowery & Meeks, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: J. Edward Allen Jr. and Richard L. Ford Jr. Fortson, Bentley & Griffin PA, Athens, for appellee.
    Case Number: A01A2441

    The condemned property's close proximity to a university and city, as well as the deteriorated nature of the immediately surrounding neighborhood, allowed the jury, in valuing the property, to consi

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Cyberlaw: Intellectual Property in the Digital Millennium

    Authors: Jay Dratler, Jr., Professor Stephen M. McJohn

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Harris v. Johnson

    Publication Date: 2002-08-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: M. Francis Stubbs Stubbs & Assocs., Reidsville, for appellant.
    for defendant: Curtis V. Cheney Jr. Cheney & Cheney PC, Reidsville, for appellees.
    Case Number: A02A1170

    Plaintiff's suit to set aside a 1987 award of a year's support to the defendant's grandmother was unt

  • Choice Capital Corp. v. Phillips

    Publication Date: 2002-08-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Barnes, Anne Elizabeth
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Graham J. Purpura, Doraville, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Larry W. Johnson Morris, Schneider & Pryor LLC, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A02A0486

    The trial court erred in finding that defendant did not incur any expenses in raising funds to meet a loan commitment which did not close due to lack of colla

  • Garden Hills Civic Ass'n v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth.

    Publication Date: 2002-08-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Ruffin, John H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard N. Hubert Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Martin, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . David D. Blum City of Atlanta Law Dep't, Charles N. Pursley Jr. Pursley, Howell, Lowery & Meeks, Carl E. Westmoreland Jr., John W. Harbin and Simon H. Bloom Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Atlanta, for appellees.
    Case Number: A02A0702

    Homeowners lacked standing to challenge a re-zoning decision because they failed to demonstrate special da

  • Dyer v. Dyer

    Publication Date: 2002-08-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stanley R. Lawson, Cleveland, for appellant.
    for defendant: Lawrence S. Sorgen Sorgen & Schindelar, Hiawassee, for appellee.
    Case Number: S02A0742

    Although decedent's will stated that her additional sons had the right to build a house on property bequeathed to one son, any alleged easement created by this language failed because such an easeme

  • Lifestyle Family LP v. Lawyers Title Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 2002-08-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Mikell, Charles B.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William H. Hughes Jr. Alston & Bird, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Richard L. Robbins, Julianne N. Belaga, Deborah M. Danzig Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan LLP, and Kevin H. Hudson Rowe, Foltz & Martin PC, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A02A0668

    Plaintiff's alleged brokerage agreement with defendant was unenforceable because the parties did not reach a meeting of the minds on an essential term—plaintiff's commi