Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
1,823 results for '* industry:"Real Estate"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2001-01-19
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Phipps, Herbert E.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: L. Robert Lovett Lovett, Cowart & Ayerbe LLC, Macon, for appellant.
for defendant: . James A. Vaughn Vaughn, Wright & Stearns LLP, Forsyth, and Frederick L. Wright II, Atlanta, for appellee.
Case Number: A00A1192
Even if the plaintiff's first letter exercising its option to purchase leased property was ineffective, the letter did not constitute a rejection of the option which remained in effect throughout t
Publication Date: 2001-01-19
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Eldridge, Frank M.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert H. Benefield Jr., Atlanta, for appellant.
for defendant: Michael J. Gorby, Christine A. Carson, Karen E. Cooper Gorby, Reeves, Peters & Burns and Daniel E. Turner, Atlanta, for appellees.
Case Number: A00A2064
There was no evidence that defendants attempted to conceal their alleged delay in filing a UCC financing stat
Publication Date: 2001-01-12
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Mikell, Charles B.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Patrick L. Meriwether and Robert L. Tharp Meriwether & Tharp, Roswell, for appellant.
for defendant: . Michael Weinstock Weinstock & Scavo PC, Atlanta, Thomas G. Sampson Thomas, Kennedy, Sampson & Patterson, Atlanta, Monica E. Ewing, Atlanta, Lemuel H. Ward and Bernard R. Thomas Sr., Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Atlanta Law Department, Atlanta, for appellees.
Case Number: A00A2211
The plaintiffs' appeal was moot because they did not challenge the trial court's grant of summary judgment to the defen
Publication Date: 2001-01-12
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Pope, Marion T.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: William D. Friend, John W. Sandifer and Mari Meyer Gerry, Friend & Sapronov LLP, Atlanta, for appellant.
for defendant: Jeffrey G. Casurella, Marietta, Brian N. Smiley and James M. Bishop Page & Bacek, Atlanta, for appellee. Other party representation: Mark M. Middleton, Norcross.
Case Number: A00A1179
The plaintiffs were not entitled to recover late fees that they voluntarily paid to a cable company, even if the late fees were an unenforceable pe
Publication Date: 2001-01-05
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Pope, Marion T.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Carol V. Clark McCalla, Raymer, Padrick, Cobb, Nichols & Clark, Atlanta, for appellant.
for defendant: . Leon Van Gelderen and John A. Ziolo Cornelson & Van Gelderen LLP, Atlanta, for appellees.
Case Number: A00A1053
The buyers were merely incidental beneficiaries of the closing attorney's contract with defendant to survey the seller's pro
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Stephen Fishman
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2001-01-05
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Ruffin, John H.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Susan M. Garrett, Decatur, for appellant.
for defendant: . Frank E. Jenkins III, Peter R. Olson Jenkins & Nelson, Cartersville, Andrea C. Jones and G. Douglas Dillard Dillard & Galloway, Atlanta, for appellees.
Case Number: A00A1035
The plaintiff's suit seeking a declaration as to the legal effect of the county Board of Commissioners' action on a rezoning petition was not an appeal of a zoning decision because the plaintiffs w
Publication Date: 2000-12-15
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Ruffin, John H.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: James N. Butterworth, Cornelia, for appellant.
for defendant: . J. Douglas Stewart Stewart, Melvin & Frost, Gainesville, for appellees.
Case Number: A00A1089
Defendant's agreement to purchase pro for plaintiffs at a public sale was unenforceable because the parties never agreed on how much defendant would pay for the pro
Publication Date: 2000-12-15
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert T. Thompson Jr., Melinda A. Garlington Thompson & Assocs., Gordon J. Rose and Stephen G. Weizenecker, Atlanta, for appellant.
for defendant: H. Michael Bray Bray & Johnson, Canton, for appellee.
Case Number: A00A1607
Homeowner was properly enjoined from hanging a sign on his property that read, "Before You Buy A Home In Here PLEASE See US" because the sign violated the restrictive covenants applicable to the hom
Publication Date: 2000-12-15
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Benham, Robert
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Wade M. Crumbley Crumbley & Crumbley, McDonough, for appellant.
for defendant: . G. Douglas Dillard and Andrea C. Jones Dillard & Galloway LLC, Atlanta, for appellees. Amicus Appellees: David H. Flint, Mark W. Forsling Schreeder, Wheeler & Flint LLP, Harold G. Clarke, Charles F. Palmer, David C. Kirk Troutman Sanders LLP, Richard W. Wilson Jr., James S. Teague Jr. Wilson, Brock & Irby LLC, Atlanta, Michele LeFaivre National Assoc. of Home Builders, Washington, D.C.
Case Number: S00A1200
County board of commissioners' arbitrary rezoning of property which made it impossible for a real estate company to build cluster homes amounted to an unconstitutional t
Publication Date: 2000-12-15
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert R. Cook Hendrix Law Firm PC, Richmond Hill, for appellant.
for defendant: Mills L. Morrison and Robert A. Lewallen Jr. Hunter, Maclean, Exley & Dunn PC, Savannah, for appellee.
Case Number: A00A1213
The 76-year-old widow was not bound by her ele to take property under her husband's will because there was no evidence that she knew she was entitled to a year's support when she made the ele
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read