Filter This View

  • Lynch v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-10-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A1013

    The defendant did not show that his trial counsel was deficient for failing to interview and subpoena two fact witnesses, who could have shown that the damage to his vehicle predated the alleged hit

  • JBM Investments LLC v. Callahan Indus. Inc.

    Publication Date: 2008-10-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A1142

    The parties' contract assigning a purchase and sales agreement for the right to purchase 160 acres in Barrow county unambiguously provided that the assignment's consideration would be refund

  • In the Interest of A. A.

    Publication Date: 2008-09-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A0953; A08A0954; A08A0955

    Evidence that the father and mother's then 15-month-old child suffered a traumatic, unexplained, life-threatening injury, while in her parents' primary care, combined with their history of a

  • Robinson v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-09-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A1353

    The defendant's equal prote claim based on O.C.G.A. § 40-5-151 was only relevant to his license suspension, not his DUI convi

  • Holt v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-09-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A1560

    A closed parking booth fell with the category of building as a matter of law under O.C.G.A. § 1

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Montgomery County Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Carnes v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-09-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A1252

    The evidence did not suggest that the arresting officer unreasonably prolonged a valid traffic stop, since the total time from when the officer activated his lights to the defendant's arrest was

  • Smith v. Morris, Manning & Martin LLP

    Publication Date: 2008-08-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A0743; A08A0744

    Questions of fact remained in plaintiffs' suit against a law firm arising out of the extended negotiations involving a real estate development project in which plaintiffs planned to develop a lu

  • Wilson v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-08-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A0401

    The arresting officer was entitled to conduct an open air search around the defendant's vehicle with his canine unit, while the lawful stop was in progress, since he did not impermissibly prolon

  • In the Interest of D. B. C.

    Publication Date: 2008-07-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A0241

    Evidence that bot nts had a medically verifiable deficiency of their mental or emotional health of such duration or nature so as to render them unable to provide adequately for the children, bo

  • Darden v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-07-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A0332

    Since officers had a reasonable suspicion to stop the defendant's vehicle, his later consent to search his apartment was not ta