Filter This View

  • In the Interest of: A. J. I.

    Publication Date: 2006-02-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sean Black Black Law Offices, Toccoa, for appellant.
    for defendant: Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Shalen S. Nelson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Charissa A. Ruel and Deidra L. Schad, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A05A2242; A05A2243

    There was no clear and convincing evidence that the mother's children were dep

  • Yun v. Um

    Publication Date: 2006-01-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael W. Higgins Higgins & Dubner, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Robert A. Harrison II and John R. Grimes Lefkoff, Duncan, Grimes & Miller PC, Atlanta, for appellees.
    Case Number: A05A1629

    No evidence supported the trial court's conclusion that the plaintiff and the first de t entered into a partnership when they purchased a liquor store that was partially financed by the first d

  • Johnson v. State

    Publication Date: 2006-01-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Drew Findling and Cris E. Schneider The Findling Law Firm, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Jewel C. Scott, District Attorney, and Billy J. Dixon, Assistant District Attorney, Jonesboro, for appellee.
    Case Number: A05A1491

    The defendant confessed that he was the masked gunman who accosted two employees, forced them into a business office and robbed a movie th

  • Kidd v. State

    Publication Date: 2006-01-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas P. Lenzer Lenzer & Lenzer, Norcross, for appellant.
    for defendant: Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, and Donald P. Geary, Assistant District Attorney, Lawrenceville, for appellee.
    Case Number: A05A1438

    The trial court did not improperly shift the burden of proof to the defendant in charging the jury that an owner of an automobile is presumed to be in possession of its contents, since the trial cou

  • Kidd v. State

    Publication Date: 2005-12-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas P. Lenzer Lenzer & Lenzer, Norcross, for appellant.
    for defendant: Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, and Donald P. Geary, Assistant District Attorney, Lawrenceville, for appellee.
    Case Number: A05A1438

    The trial court did not improperly shift the burden of proof to the defendant in charging the jury that an owner of an automobile is presumed to be in possession of its contents, since the trial cou

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Library of California Employment Law Forms

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. Evans

    Publication Date: 2005-12-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Patrick J. Rice Hull, Towill, Norman, Barrett & Salley PC, Augusta, and Herbert D. Shellhouse Troutman Sanders LLP, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Thomas R. Burnside III Burnside, Wall, Daniel, Ellison & Revell, Augusta, for appellees.
    Case Number: A05A1058

    The plaintiff and her insurer reached an accord and satisfaction regarding the insurance proceeds the plaintiff would receive for the total loss of her car when the plaintiff cashed a check containi

  • Rogers v. Estate of Harris

    Publication Date: 2005-12-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Floyd H. Farless, Rome, for appellant.
    for defendant: Karen S. Wilkes and Sidney P. Wright, Rome, for appellee.
    Case Number: A05A0970

    The Court lacked jurisdiction over the appellant's a of the denial of his motion to set aside a consent order, because he failed to file a timely application for discretionary a

  • Rutledge v. State

    Publication Date: 2005-12-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mary Erickson, Decatur, for appellant.
    for defendant: Patrick H. Head, District Attorney, Amelia G. Pray and Reuben M. Green, Assistant District Attorneys, Marietta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A05A1272

    The evidence supported a finding that the defendant displayed a plastic gun when he demanded money from the cashier of a fast food resta

  • In re I. M. G.

    Publication Date: 2005-12-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joshua D. Earwood, Cartersville, for appellant.
    for defendant: in A05A1505. Thomas N. Brunt, Cartersville, for appellant. in A05A1506. Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Shalen S. Nelson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Charissa A. Ruel, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, and Barry S. Haney Neel & Smith, Cartersville, for appellee. Other party representation: Kelley A. Dial Georgia Public Defender Standards Council, Cartersville.
    Case Number: A05A1505 & A05A1506

    The juvenile court erred in admitting testimony from a psychotherapist, who was providing mental health treatment to the mother, in a parental termination proce

  • State v. Whitt

    Publication Date: 2005-12-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Denise D. Fachini, District Attorney, and Cheri L. Nichols, Assistant District Attorney, Cordele, for appellant.
    for defendant: John W. Sherrer Jr., Vienna, for appellee. Other party representation: John C. Cotton, Cordele.
    Case Number: A05A1520

    The officer's continued detention of the defendant after the completion of a traffic stop for speeding was based on a reasonable and articulable suspicion that the defendant was engaging in criminal