Filter This View

  • Howard v. Economy Lodging Sys. Inc.

    Publication Date: 2004-10-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Todd K. Maziar, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Karsten Bicknese and Daniel S. Wright Seacrest, Karesh, Tate & Bicknese, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A04A1223

    The plaintiff's personal injury action against the defendant was automatically dismissed under O.C.G.A. § 9-2-60 b, since no written order was entered in the case for more than five

  • Van Morgan v. State

    Publication Date: 2004-10-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stacy D. Barnett The Barnett Law Firm, Canton, for appellant.
    for defendant: Garry T. Moss, District Attorney, and Scott T. Poole Office of the District Attorney, Canton, for appellee.
    Case Number: A04A0796

    Trial counsel's decision not to introduce an audiotape of a conversation that arguably implicated the defendant's nephew as an additional conspirator was strategically based on his decision that it

  • Atlanta Empowerment Zone Corp. v. Light Energy Management Inc.

    Publication Date: 2004-10-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Pickens A. Patterson Jr. Thomas, Kennedy, Sampson & Patterson, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Ronald D. Reemsnyder Welch, Spell, Reemsnyder, Pless & Davis PC, Atlanta, for appellees.
    Case Number: A04A1470

    An application to confirm the sale of real property is not subject to transfer pursuant to U.S.C.R.

  • In the Interest of S. A. B.

    Publication Date: 2004-10-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Danny C. Griffin, Colquitt, for appellant.
    for defendant: Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, William C. Joy, Shalen S. Nelson, Senior Assistant Attorneys General, Laura W. Hyman, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, and Lauren H. Williamson, Albany, for appellee. Other party representation: Thomas E. Sasser III William S. Stone PC, Blakely.
    Case Number: A04A1168

    The 14-year-old child's testimony regarding the anger he felt at being in prolonged foster care and his desire to be adopted by his foster parent supported termination of his mother's parental r

  • Rodericus v. State

    Publication Date: 2004-10-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert L. Mack Jr., Jonesboro, for appellant.
    for defendant: Robert E. Keller, District Attorney, and Erman J. Tanjuatco, Assistant District Attorney, Jonesboro, for appellee.
    Case Number: A04A1317

    The habeas court's order transferring defendant's claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel to the trial court was void ab initio as an unauthorized exercise of auth

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Constangy’s Field Guide to The Family Medical Leave Act 2014

    Authors: Michael D. Malfitano

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • In the Interest of J. B. C.

    Publication Date: 2004-10-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Judd T. Drake, Metter, for appellant.
    for defendant: Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, William C. Joy Shalen S. Nelson, Senior Assistant District Attorneys, Laura W. Hyman, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, and Sherri P. McDonald Newton, Smith, Durden, Kaufold & Rice, Vidalia, for appellee. Other party representation: John K. Gross, Metter.
    Case Number: A04A1095

    The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in finding that it was in the minor children's best interests to remain in the custody of DFACS for the purpose of allowing them to be adopted by thei

  • Collins v. State

    Publication Date: 2004-09-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Murl E. Geary, Hinesville, for appellant.
    for defendant: John T. Durden Jr., District Attorney, and James S. Archer, Chief Assistant District Attorney, Hinesville, for appellee.
    Case Number: A04A1494

    The defendant was not entitled to a charge on sexual battery, because the evidence showed sexual activity, rather than mere tou

  • Gordon v. Gordon

    Publication Date: 2004-09-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ben B. Mills Jr. Mills & Chasteen PC, Fitzgerald, for appellant.
    for defendant: Beverly A. Gordon, Davisboro, proceeded pro se.
    Case Number: A04A1296

    Habeas corpus was not an available remedy to inquire into the legality of the child's custody because the maternal grandmother sought custody in the child's best interest, rather than under some cla

  • Curry v. State

    Publication Date: 2004-09-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John R. Francisco and Elizabeth R. Francisco Sinnreich & Francisco, Macon, for appellant.
    for defendant: Howard Z. Simms, District Attorney, Macon, for appellee.
    Case Number: A04A1047

    The robbery s' cash drawer was in their immediate presence, even though their backs were turned when the defendant took it, because the cash drawer was less than six feet away and at least one

  • In the Interest of M. B.

    Publication Date: 2004-06-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: DuAnn C. Davis Glen A. Cheney PC, Reidsville, for M. B. Brantley J. Swindell McCullough & Swindell, Glennville, for C. B. Carol B. Miller, Pembroke, for D. B. John T. Durden Jr., District Attorney, and Claira E. Mitcham, Assistant District Attorney, Hinesville, for appellee.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A04A0586

    Corroboration in a criminal damage to property case must be independent of an accomplice's test