• Whitley v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-10-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A08A0887

    The defendant intentionally aided and abetted a home invasion in which the home was burglarized and the home's 16-year-old occupant was detained and robbed by use of a ha

  • Williams v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-10-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A08A1356

    The trial court properly admitted the child victims' hearsay statements without a finding that the evidence was sufficiently reliable, since the testimony concerned the same matters detailed in

  • Turner v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-10-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A08A1407

    Although the investigating officer did not know the exact location of the shooting, he testified that the shooting took place in Fulton county, in a neighborhood around the corner from 545 Mayland A

  • Ford v. Hanna

    Publication Date: 2008-10-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A08A1177

    The trial court erred with respect to child support, since the trial court ratified parties agreement to waive child support in light of fact that each parent had physical custody of one child witho

  • Memar v. Styblo

    Publication Date: 2008-09-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A08A1054

    The statute of repose did not bar a medical malpractice action, which was filed within the 5-year repose period, even though the real party in interest was not substituted as a proper party plaintif

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Philadelphia County Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Pottinger v. Smith

    Publication Date: 2008-09-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A08A1461

    The defendant was entitled to summary judgment under O.C.G.A. § 51-1-29.5, since no clear and convincing evidence showed that the defendant failed to exercise even slight care and was thus gro

  • Gowins v. Gary

    Publication Date: 2008-09-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A07A0642

    The trial court could not hold a father in contempt for failing to pay child support under a private settlement agreement prior to its incorporation into an April 2005 court jud

  • Coote v. Branch Banking and Trust Co.

    Publication Date: 2008-07-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A08A0365

    The plaintiff, an experienced real estate investor, failed to exercise ordinary care for his interests, since he took no steps to verify that the real property at issue's stated value was co

  • Snider v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-07-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A08A1040

    An overnight guest, though not registered, had a protected reasonable expectation of privacy in the hotel room, which he occ

  • Martin v. State of Ga.

    Publication Date: 2008-07-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A08A0775

    The appellant failed to show that he was an innocent owner of two forfeited vehicles under O.C.G.A. § 16-13-49