Filter This View

  • Bell v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-04-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A0656

    The state failed to prove venue for the defendant's conviction for misdemeanor obstruction by fl

  • Brantley v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-04-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A0107

    The defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered his non-negotiated guilty plea to habitual violator, DUI and two traffic off

  • Chacon v. Holcombe

    Publication Date: 2008-04-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A0138

    The evidence did not authorize the jury's general award of $42,690.05 to the plaintiff for money he claimed was due on an oral agreement for him to perform general contractor services on the

  • William E. Honey Bus. Interest LLLP v. Georgia Power Co.

    Publication Date: 2008-04-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A07A1962

    A tract of land the defendant acquired by condemnation more than 20 years ago and across which defendant had an electric transmission line easement, but to date had not constructed the power lines a

  • Corn v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-04-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A07A1743

    The defendant opened the door to admitting evidence that his co-defendant passed an unstipulated polygraph test by implicating the defendant in methamphetamine traffi

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Medical Malpractice Law 2025

    Authors: Jonathan H. Lomurro, Gary L. Riveles, Abbott S. Brown

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Dalton v. Peachtree LP

    Publication Date: 2008-04-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A07A1967; A07A1968; A07A1969; A07A1970

    The injured plaintiffs, who worked for an independent subcontractor, failed to show that the property owner retained the right to control the time and manner of the subcontractor's work or that

  • Hathaway Dev. Co. Inc. v. Advantage Fire Sprinkler Co. Inc.

    Publication Date: 2008-04-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A07A1956

    The defendant waived its right to insist on arbitration of plaintiff's breach of contract claims and for recovery of extra work under quantum meruit, arising out of two subcontracts for the plai

  • State v. Goodman

    Publication Date: 2008-03-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A07A2508

    The plain-clothed investigator's uninvited and unannounced entry into the defendant's home violated the defendant's 4th Amendment r

  • Rachels v. Thompson

    Publication Date: 2008-03-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A07A1899

    No evidence showed that the defendant purposefully planted foliage that allegedly obscured the driver's view and caused a fatal automobile acc

  • Wilcox Holdings LTD v. Hull

    Publication Date: 2008-03-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A07A2396

    The plaintiff was entitled to an easement across the defendants' property, but the plaintiff could not dictate where the defendants could place their buildings, walkways or parking s