Filter This View

  • Abend v. Klaudt

    Publication Date: 2000-04-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Lori G. Baer and Candice Stone Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . David A. Sleppy and Dennis T. Cathey Cathey & Strain, Cornelia, for appellees. Other party representation: Robert G. Tanner and Johnathan T. Krawcheck Long, Weinberg, Ansley & Wheeler, Atlanta.
    Case Number: A99A1862

    The 5-year statute of repose in O.C.G.A. § 9-3-71 b does not bar a foreign object medical malpractice action that is timely filed within the 1-year limitation period for that type of

  • Taylor v. Thompkins

    Publication Date: 2000-04-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ronald B. Warren Whitehurst, Cohen & Blackburn, Thomasville, for appellant.
    for defendant: William C. Sanders Alexander & Vann, Thomasville, for appellees. Other party representation: George C. Floyd, Bainbridge, Henry P. Scott Young, Thagard, Hoffman, Scott & Smith, Valdosta.
    Case Number: A00A0637

    Any inference that defendant owned the unbranded cow which plaintiff struck in the road disappeared when defendant showed that all of his cows are branded, none of them were missing and no gap exist

  • Ethridge v. Davis

    Publication Date: 2000-04-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Wendell K. Howell Jones, Cork & Miller, Macon, for appellant.
    for defendant: . F. Robert Raley, Macon, for appellee.
    Case Number: A99A1844

    Even though the landlord had a duty to repair the in the tenant's ceiling, the landlord was not liable for the tenant's slipping on water that dripped intermittently from that

  • Tudor v. Ford

    Publication Date: 2000-04-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael S. Reeves and Terrell W. Benton III Gorby, Reeves, Peters & Burns PC, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Lonzy F. Edwards Edwards & Youmas, Macon, for appellee.
    Case Number: A99A1646

    The diabetic plaintiff's experts could not reasonably conclude that his leg infection was related to his stepping on a nail at the defendant's

  • Edwards v. Georgia Dep't of Children & Youth Servs.

    Publication Date: 2000-04-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph W. Watkins, Lance D. Lourie Watkins, Lourie & Roll LLP, Atlanta, William P. Langdale Jr. and William P. Langdale III Langdale, Vallotton, Linahan, Threlkeld & Wetherington, Valdosta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Ziva P. Bruckner, Paul H. Dunbar III Capers, Dunbar, Sanders & Bruckner, Augusta, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, and Patricia Guilday, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A98A2218

    The Court of Appeals adopted the Supreme Court's judgment that state employees are not immune from liability resulting from their decisions as to what type of emergency treatment to provide incarcer

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Antitrust: An Economic Approach

    Authors: Richard A. Givens

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Johnson

    Publication Date: 2000-04-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David R. Smith and Beverly G. O'Hearn Brannen, Searcey & Smith, Savannah, for appellant.
    for defendant: Charles R. Ashman and Brian E. Krapf Ashman, Lasky & Cooper, Savannah, for appellee.
    Case Number: A99A2487

    The trial court could not modify its judgment for the defendant after the expiration of the term in which that judgment was en

  • Bullard v. State

    Publication Date: 2000-04-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Donald F. Samuel Garland, Samuel & Loeb PC, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: J. Tom Morgan III, District Attorney, Decatur, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Atlanta, and Nancy B. Bordeaux, Assistant Attorney General, Tucker, for appellee.
    Case Number: A99A1695

    Undisputed evidence showed that the defendant actively participated in the creation of false documents after the GBI began investigating her husband for Medicaid

  • In re Mauldin

    Publication Date: 2000-03-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael W. Tyler and Audra A. Dial Kilpatrick Stockton, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: William T. McBroom III, District Attorney, Thomaston, and James E. Hardin, Assistant District Attorney, Fayetteville, for appellee.
    Case Number: A99A2095

    The trial court properly sentenced defendant to three days in jail after he chose to perform in an out-of-state music tour instead of reporting for jury duty after the superior court denied his waiv

  • Clark v. Joiner

    Publication Date: 2000-03-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: J. Thomas Whelchel Whelchel, Brown, Readdick & Bumgartner, Brunswick, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Andrew A. Taylor, St. Marys, for appellee.
    Case Number: A99A1765

    Plaintiff could not recover on his dog claim since there was no evidence that the dog had bitten someone before or that the dog's owners knew of his propensity to

  • Zager v. Brown

    Publication Date: 2000-03-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert M. Goldberg, Roswell, for appellant.
    for defendant: Ruth W. Woodling Fisher & Phillips, Atlanta, for appellees.
    Case Number: A99A2100

    Employer's letter stating that employee had a two-year contract with the company was not an enforceable employment contract since it did not describe nature or location of employee's d