• Hill v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-07-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Barnes, Anne Elizabeth
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Eric J. Taylor, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Paul L. Howard Jr., District Attorney, and Peggy A. Katz, Senior Assistant District Attorney, Atlanta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A11A0578

    The trial court should have charged on the principle of no duty to retreat in self-de cases since it was the defendant's sole de

  • Tookes v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-07-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Barnes, Anne Elizabeth
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jimmonique R. S. Rodgers Georgia Public Defender Standards Council, Atlanta, for Tookes. L. Elizabeth Lane, Macon, for Smalls. Tommy K. Floyd, District Attorney, and John A. Pipkin III, Assistant District Attorney, McDonough, for appellee.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A11A1002; A11A1008

    The evidence showed that the defendants used a gun to facilitate the ro

  • Bell v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-07-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Barnes, Anne Elizabeth
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Billy M. Grantham, Bainbridge, for appellant.
    for defendant: Joseph K. Mulholland, District Attorney, Bainbridge, for appellee.

    Case Number: A11A0118

    Information elicited from a juror during voir dire was inherently prejudicial and deprived defendant of his right to begin trial with a jury free from even a suspicion of prejudgment or fixed op

  • Palmyra Park Hosp. Inc. v. Phoebe Sumter Med. Ctr.

    Publication Date: 2011-07-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Barnes, Anne Elizabeth
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stanley S. Jones JR. and Keri F. Conley Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough, Atlanta, for Palmyra Park Hosp. James M. Skipper Jr. Americus, John H. Parker Jr., David L. Fenstermacher, Thomas D. Watry Parker, Hudson, Rainer & Dobbs, Joshua B. Belinfante, June P. Veazey, Atlanta, and Richard M. Ellis Rutledge, Ecenia & Purnell, Tallahassee, Fla., for Phoebe Sumter Med. Ctr. and Phoebe Putney Mem'l Hosp. Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Isaac Byrd, Deputy Attorney General, Sidney R. Barrett Jr., Senior Assistant Attorney General, E. Tandy Menk, Alex F. Sponseller, Assistant Attorneys General, Atlanta, for Georgia Dep't of Community Health. Other party representation: Robert C. Threlkeld Morris, Manning & Martin LLP, Atlanta.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A11A0730; A11A0731; A11A0732; A11A0733

    The Georgia Department of Community Health did not exceed its statutory authority in its interpretation of the legislative intent behind the Areawide Need Exception in O.C.G.A. § 31-9-42 or in its a

  • Charlot v. Goldwire

    Publication Date: 2011-07-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Barnes, Anne Elizabeth
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Larousse Charlot, Jacksonville, Fla., proceeded pro se. Meesha Goldwire, Orlando, Fla., proceeded pro se.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A11A0684

    The trial court's order failed to specify any basis for the trial court's award of attorneys' fees to the m

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Estate & Trust Litigation 2024

    Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III, Cathleen T. Butler

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Coker v. Moemeka

    Publication Date: 2011-07-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Barnes, Anne Elizabeth
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Befaithful Coker, Lake City, Fla., proceeded pro se. Elizabeth J. Nunnelley, Roswell, for appellee.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A11A0005

    A trial court does not have authority to modify a final order of custody during a contempt proce

  • Crossmark Inc. v. Strickland

    Publication Date: 2011-07-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Barnes, Anne Elizabeth
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Phillip A. Sibley and Adam J. Hand Murphy & Sibley PC, Macon for appellant.
    for defendant: . Melissa M. Peavy, Valdosta, for appellee. Other party representation: Delece Brooks State Bd. of Workers' Compensation, Atlanta.

    Case Number: A11A0478

    The Appellate Division correctly upheld ALJ's assessment of attorneys' fees under O.C.G.A. § 34-9-108 b 2 because the employer offered no reasonable grounds for its failure to comply with O.C.G.A. §

  • Bailey v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-07-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Barnes, Anne Elizabeth
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Nathaniel L. Smith, Carrollton, for appellant.
    for defendant: Peter J. Skandalakis, District Attorney, and David P. Taylor, Assistant District Attorney, Carrollton, for appellee.

    Case Number: A11A0919

    A defendant's intent to control or possess contraband may be inferred from f

  • Fleming v. Harbourne

    Publication Date: 2011-07-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Barnes, Anne Elizabeth
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James B. Blackburn Jr. Wiseman, Blackburn & Futrell, Savannah, for appellant.
    for defendant: . G. Brinson Williams Jr. Jones, Osteen, Jones & Arnold, Hinesville, for appellees.

    Case Number: A11A0520

    The plaintiff was not entitled to summary judgment in its suit to recover sums under a surety agreement since the plaintiff admitted that the defendants had already paid the principal amoun

  • McCrary v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-07-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Barnes, Anne Elizabeth
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Henry A. Hibbert Cromwell & Hibbert, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Paul L. Howard Jr., District Attorney, Bettieanne C. Hart, Deputy District Attorney, Stephany J. Luttrell, Assistant District Attorney, and Paige R. Whitaker District Attorney's Office, Atlanta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A11A0639

    On plain error review, the defendant could not show that the jury instruction on level of certainty affected his substantial rights because the victim observed the defendant at close range, immediat