• Crittenton v. Southland Owners Ass'n Inc.

    Publication Date: 2011-11-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Dillard, Stephen Louis A.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Samira J. Martin Jones Martin LLC, Atlanta, for appellants. Jason A. LoMonaco Weissman Nowack Curry & Wilco PC, Atlanta, for appellees.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A11A0990

    A declaratory judgment action requires a plaintiff to ' "show facts or circumstances whereby it is in a position of uncertainty or insecurity because of a dispute and of having to take some future a

  • Hall v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-11-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Dillard, Stephen Louis A.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sharon L. Hopkins, Duluth, for appellant. Garry T. Moss, District Attorney, Patricia G. Hull and Cliff Head, Assistant District Attorneys, Canton, for appellee.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A11A1416

    The same conduct predicated one of the defendant's aggravated assault convi and his armed robbery convi

  • Stafford v. Bryan County

    Publication Date: 2011-11-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Dillard, Stephen Louis A.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Andrew S. Johnson Arnold Stafford & Randolph, and Jeffery L. Arnold, Hinesville, for appellant. Charles H. Brown and Jesse A. Van Brown Rountree & Stewart PC, Statesboro, for appellee.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A11A1274

    The superior court erred in denying a petition for certiorari from the magistrate court's judgment against the petitioner for violating a county ordinance, as neither court ruled on the vagueness a

  • In the Interest of S. B.

    Publication Date: 2011-11-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Dillard, Stephen Louis A.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Phyllis R. Williams, Decatur, for appellant. Yolanda M. Smith-Williams The Smith Williams Law Firm LLC, Marietta, Rosalind M. Zollicoffer, Decatur, Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, and Shalen S. Nelson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellee.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A11A1224

    The actions of the parents as to their two older children authorized the juvenile court to find that two younger siblings were also dep

  • McClain v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-10-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Dillard, Stephen Louis A.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sheueli C. Wang Georgia Public Defender Standards Council Appellate Division, Atlanta, for appellant. Robert D. James Jr., District Attorney, and Daniel J. Quinn, Assistant District Attorney, Decatur, for appellee.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A11A1102

    The store manager's testimony regarding her review of the store's video surveillance system recording, which had since been recorded over and was unavailable for viewing at the defendant's armed rob

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Bucks County Court Rules 2023

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Morgan v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-10-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Dillard, Stephen Louis A.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jessica R. Towne Clark & Towne PC, Lawrenceville, for appellant. Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, and Jennifer M. Taylor, Assistant District Attorney, Lawrenceville, for appellee.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A11A0911

    Although the defendant testified that he did not consent to a search of the vehicle he was driving and in which cocaine was discovered, the officer testified that the defendant readily consented to

  • Norman v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-10-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Dillard, Stephen Louis A.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Harold W. Wallace III, Public Defender, Thomson, for appellant. Dennis C. Sanders, District Attorney, Durwood R. Davis, Assistant District Attorney, and Kevin R. Majeska District Attorney's Office, Thomson, for appellee.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A11A0852

    Evidence that the defendant helped plan the robberies of two video-poker game rooms, drove the getaway vehicle, and participated in the division of the proceeds showed that he was a party to the c

  • Murphree v. Yancey Bros. Co.

    Publication Date: 2011-10-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Dillard, Stephen Louis A.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Christopher S. Cohilas Watson Spence LLP, Albany, for appellants. John C. Spurlin Spurlin & McCorvey, Tifton, Daniel M. Shea and Matthew T. Gomes Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Atlanta, for appellee.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A11A1079

    A restrictive covenant in an employment contract prohibiting the defendant from soliciting customers he had serviced during his last two years of employment for the purpose of competing with his for

  • First Media Group Inc. v. Doe

    Publication Date: 2011-10-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Dillard, Stephen Louis A.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David H. Flint, Mark W. Forsling Schreeder Wheeler & Flint LLP, and Jay D. Bennett Alston & Bird, Atlanta, for appellant. Lance A. Cooper, Marietta, and Robert K. Finnell, Rome, for appellee.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A11A1248

    Because the p ff did not have actual notice of the trial court's intended disposition of the defendant's summary judgment motion, she was entitled to voluntarily dismiss her comp

  • Veasey v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-10-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Dillard, Stephen Louis A.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brandon Lewis, Norcross, for appellant. J. David Miller, District Attorney, Valdosta, and Robert R. Auman, Assistant District Attorney, Thomasville, for appellee.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A11A1434

    The Court has previously upheld Batson challenge denials when, as in this case, the stated reasons involved information the state gathered through off-the-record discussions with law enforc