Filter This View

  • Kaminer v. Canas

    Publication Date: 2008-11-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A06A1338; A06A1339; A06A1340; A06A1341

    The 2-year statute of limitation began to run on the plaintiff's misdiagnosis claim on the dates that his treating physicians first failed to diagnose the plaintiff's AIDS cond

  • Walker v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-11-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A09A0043

    The a ng officer discovered a crack pipe in the defendant's sock during a search incident to his a

  • Thomas v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-10-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A1808

    Under the circumstances, the defendant was not under arrest when a county officer conducted field sobriety

  • Clarke v. Country Home Bakers

    Publication Date: 2008-10-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A2032

    The petitioner was not an employee at the time of his injuries, because he was working at a bakery through a work-release program, while serving a 6-year sentence for vehicle homicide and DUI, and t

  • Levenson v. Word

    Publication Date: 2008-10-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A1731

    The defendants' receipt of funds from the decedent's estate for representing his wife in her murder case did not constitute conversion, since she was not convicted of the decedent's murd

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Connecticut Appellate Practice & Procedure, 8th Edition

    Authors: HON. ELIOT D. PRESCOTT, JULIE A. LAVOIE

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Staton v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 2008-10-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A1606

    The plaintiff understood that two UM policies would in the event of a catastrophic accident, such as the one, which occurred in this

  • Unified Gov't of Athens-Clarke County v. Georgia Pub. Serv. Comm'n

    Publication Date: 2008-10-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A1326

    Judgment affirming Georgia Public Service Commission's "PSC" decision to reduce the amount of municipal franchise fees power company may recover from its rate base from four percent o

  • Bullington v. Blakely Crop Hail Inc.

    Publication Date: 2008-10-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A1905

    Some evidence supported the plaintiff's claim that he brought legal action within 12 months of the date the insurer denied his claim, arising out of damage to the plaintiff's 2001 peanut

  • Simpson v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-10-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A1562

    The 15-year-old defendant's father's comments, while thinking aloud during the defendant's interview, did not constitute a clear invocation of the defendant's right to co

  • Elamin v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-10-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A1330

    The presentation to the jury of the theories of parties to a crime and conspiracy did not constitute a constructive amendment to the defendant's indic