• Veal v. State

    Publication Date: 2000-05-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William D. Phillips, Macon, for appellant.
    for defendant: Fredric D. Bright, District Attorney, Milledgeville, and Shelley S. Tice, Assistant District Attorney, Gray, for appellee.

    Case Number: A99A2336

    Witness testimony that a nightclub dispute involving gang signs preceded defendant's shooting a 9 mm in the nightclub's parking lot was admissible as res gestae, even if it incidentally put defendan

  • Newberry v. Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 2000-04-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel M. Roper Shaw, Maddox, Graham, Monk & Boling, Rome, for appellant.
    for defendant: Deeann B. Waller Chambers, Mabry, McClelland & Brooks, Atlanta, for appellee. Other party representation: Billy J. Crane Mundy & Gammage PC, Cedartown.

    Case Number: A99A2395

    Plaintiff was not justified in believing that the att representing his insurer at his sworn statement was also his att

  • Fugarino v. State

    Publication Date: 2000-04-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Scott R. King Slater, King & Gross, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, and George F. Hutchinson III, Assistant District Attorney, Lawrenceville, for appellee.

    Case Number: A99A1781

    The defendant committed computer trespass when he deleted large portions of a computer pr that he was working on for his employer without authority to delete any part of that pr

  • In re A.S.O. & N.L.R.

    Publication Date: 2000-04-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Lawrence M. Korn, Marietta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, William C. Joy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Shalen A. Sgrosso, Sanders B. Deen and Dennis R. Dunn, Assistant Attorneys General, Atlanta, for appellee. Other party representation: Reagan W. Dean and David J. Casey, Marietta, and W. Keith Barber Allen & Barber PC, Statesboro.

    Case Number: A99A2241

    The mother waived her right to a separate nonreunification hearing when she consented to the consolidation of that hearing with the action to terminate her parental r

  • Neidiger/Tucker/Bruner Inc. v. SunTrust Bank

    Publication Date: 2000-03-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David J. Larson Brock, Clay, Calhoun, Wilson & Rogers, Marietta, Frank W. Visciano and Luis Toro Senn, Lewis & Visciano PC, Denver, Colo., for appellant.
    for defendant: Robert L. Rothman and Aaron M. Danzig Arnall, Golden & Gregory, Atlanta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A00A0140

    Bank that acted as transfer agent for the sale of stock shares had a duty to disclose to the stockbroker who accepted those shares from a customer as margin trading collateral that the customer's r

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Real Estate Brokerage Law 2024

    Authors: Barry S. Goodman

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Dixon v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth.

    Publication Date: 2000-03-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert M. Goldberg, Roswell, and Michael E. Bergin Law Office of Michael E. Bergin, Fairburn, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Dennis R. Fortin, Decatur, Jeffrey E. Tompkins Thomas, Kennedy, Sampson & Patterson, Walter B. McClelland and Jo B. Gosdeck Chambers, Mabry, McClelland & Brooks, Atlanta, for appellees. Other party representation: Lee A. Frison Jr. Ward & Frison PA, Newnan.

    Case Number: A99A2221

    The trial court's elimination of all but one of plaintiffs' claims based on its sua sponte ruling that the claims were barred by collateral estoppel and res judicata did not give the plaintiffs fair

  • Nairon v. Land

    Publication Date: 2000-03-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gary C. Harris, Clayton, for appellant.
    for defendant: James G. Killough Zimmerman & Assocs., Atlanta, for appellees. Other party representation: Shelby A. Outlaw The Outlaw Firm, Decatur.

    Case Number: A99A2042

    The plaintiff could not sue the defendants for intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress based on their filing an abusive lawsuit against him, since the abusive litigation statute p

  • Cox v. State

    Publication Date: 2000-03-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A99A2374, A99A2375, A00A0173

    Defendant was not entitled to severance of his trial from that of his co-defendants even if the evidence showed he kicked the victim only once and that the majority of the victim's injuries were ca

  • Burleson v. State

    Publication Date: 2000-03-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert J. Pinnero, Albany, for appellant.
    for defendant: John R. Parks, District Attorney, Americus, for appellee.

    Case Number: A98A1178

    The Court of Appeals adopted the Supreme Court's judgment that defendant should have been considered for sentencing as a first offender since at the time he was sentenced, the law did not preclude t

  • State v. Milsap

    Publication Date: 2000-03-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James R. Osborne, District Attorney, Buchanan, and Donald N. Wilson, Assistant District Attorney, Cedartown, for appellant.
    for defendant: Charles E. Pinkard Jr. Charles E. Pinkard Jr. PC, Rockmart, for appellee.

    Case Number: A99A2064

    Once the police officer lawfully stopped defendant for his seat belt violation, the officer did not need probable cause or an articulable suspicion to ask for defendant's consent to search th