• Vaughn & Stafford

    Publication Date: 2010-11-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Vic B. Hill and Brad E. MacDonald Hill-MacDonald LLC, Marietta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Rickie L. Brown, Dalton, for appellee.

    Case Number: A10A2166

    In the mother's petition seeking a modification of child custody, the trial court lack authority to consider the father's 2008 nolo plea to third degree child cr

  • State Road and Tollway Auth. v. Electronic Transaction Consultants Corp.

    Publication Date: 2010-10-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, William W. Banks Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Julie A. Jacobs Attorney General's Office, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Bruce C. Smith and William C. Goff Morris, Manning & Martin LLP, Atlanta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A10A2103

    No evidence supported a finding that the appellant's detailed price proposal contained trade secrets exempt from public inspection upon an Open Records re

  • Davis v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-10-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert E. Perrine Jr., Americus, for appellant.
    for defendant: Plez H. Hardin, District Attorney, and Daniel P. Bibler, Assistant District Attorney, Americus, for appellee.

    Case Number: A10A1631

    The defendant pointed a gun at a teen and demanded money, then followed the teen to his aunt's house with the gun pointed at the teen's

  • Zeger v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-10-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Marvin P. Hicks III The Hicks Law Firm, Lawrenceville, for appellant.
    for defendant: Rosanna M. Szabo, Solicitor General, and Zachary W. Procter Solicitor's Office, Lawrenceville, for appellee.

    Case Number: A10A1880

    No evidence showed that the delay in the defendant's trial hampered his defense, whereas the state's inability to locate witnesses resulted in the dismissal of one charge and a directed verdict on an

  • Hall v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-10-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Long D. Vo, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Tommy K. Floyd, District Attorney, and Thomas R. McBerry, Assistant District Attorney, McDonough, for appellee.

    Case Number: A10A2064

    The arresting officer did not unreasonably prolong a traffic stop for following too cl

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Lancaster County & Berks County Court Rules 2023

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Versey v. Citizens Trust Bank

    Publication Date: 2010-10-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William R. Carlisle Jr. Carlisle Law Firm LLC, Lawrenceville, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Arnaud C. Wilson Simpson Law Offices LLP, Atlanta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A10A2013

    The bank failed to prove as a matter of law that a repossessed car's appraised value was its fair and reasonable market value at the time of either its repossession or

  • Ward v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-10-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jason R. Hasty Public Defender's Office, Augusta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Rebecca A. Wright, District Attorney, Madonna M. Little and Charles R. Sheppard, Assistant District Attorneys, Augusta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A10A1359

    Under the circumstances, the trial judge's compliments to a witness did not constitute an impermissible expression of judge's opinion regarding the evidence or the guilt of the ac

  • Hill v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-10-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michle A. Hill, Pelham, proceeded pro se. Rebecca A. Wright, District Attorney, Augusta, for appellee.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A10A2287

    The trial court lacked authority to grant the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea after the expiration of the term of court in which the plea was en

  • L.P. Gas Indus. Equip. Co. v. Burch

    Publication Date: 2010-10-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Philip W. Savrin Freeman Mathis & Gary, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Ashleigh R. Madison Savage, Turner, Pinson & Karsman, Savannah, for appellee. Other party representation: Frederick M. Valz III Carlock, Copeland, Semler & Stair, Atlanta, and Bruce D. Bailey Chambliss & Bahner, Chattanooga, Tenn.

    Case Number: A10A1406

    The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's denial of a claim for attorneys' fees under OCGA § 9-11-68, holding that, since plaintiffs' injury occurred before the effective date of t tute,

  • Newton's Crest Homeowners' Ass'n v. Camp

    Publication Date: 2010-10-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Russell B. Davis and Joshua S. Ruplin Downey & Cleveland LLP, Marietta, for Newton's Crest Homeowners' Association. Larry E. Stewart, Lawrenceville, Gregg P. Counts, Suwanee, David F. Root, Cheryl H. Shaw Carlock, Copeland Semler & Stair LLP, Katherine V. Hernacki and C. Scott Greene Bryan Cave Powell Goldstein, Atlanta, for Camp. Richard C. Foster and Lisa K. Whitfield Hicks Casey & Foster PC, Marietta, for Kennedy Development Co., Inc. for Camp. Other party representation: Dewayne Newton The Ticor Inc., Buford.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A10A1573; A10A1867

    The indemnity provision of the agreement between a homeowners' association and a development company was void and unenforceable, since it excused the development company from liability for damages r