• In the Interest of R.H., a child

    Publication Date: 2011-02-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jana L. Evans, Dallas, for appellant.
    for defendant: Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, Shalen S. Nelson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Elizabeth M. Williamson Attorney General's Office, Atlanta, and Joseph T. Justice, Dallas, for appellee. Other party representation: Margret Loutit, Carrollton, and Joy Fuller CASA, Dallas.

    Case Number: A10A2215; A10A2216

    Evidence that the father physically abused his son, sexually abused his daughter, and neglected the children's hygiene supported the juvenile court's finding that the children were dep

  • Howard v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-02-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph L. Howard, Alamo, proceeded pro se. Dennis C. Sanders, District Attorney, and Kevin R. Majeska District Attorney's Office, Thomson, for appellee.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A10A2160

    Post-conviction motion for DNA testing denied because testable evidence from defendant's 1989 trial had since been destroyed with bad faith on the state's

  • Bailey v. Kunz

    Publication Date: 2011-02-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jonathan R. Levine and Paul J. Coburn Levine & Smith LLC, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Jennifer McLeod Edwards, McLeod & Money PC, Douglasville, for appellees.

    Case Number: A10A1809

    The limiting language of O.C.G.A. § 19-7-3 b-forbidding original actions for grandparent visitation if the pa are together and living with the child-includes adoptive pa

  • In the Interest of T. C. S.

    Publication Date: 2011-02-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kathryn A. Parker, Public Defender, Royston, for appellant.
    for defendant: Robert W. Lavender, District Attorney, and Martin L. Melton III, Assistant District Attorney, Elberton, for appellee.

    Case Number: A10A1649

    The juvenile court failed to make written factual findings as to the five elements set forth in O.C.G.A. § 15-11-63 b, which were necessary to confine the juvenile to restrictive cu

  • Floyd v. American Int'l S. Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 2011-02-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: F. Glenn Moffett Jr. Moffett Law Firm PC, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Trevor G. Hiestand Harper, Waldon & Craig, Atlanta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A09A0392

    Hospital liens imposed pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 44-14-470 b do not qualify as payment of other claims under O.C.G.A. § 33-7-11 b 1 D ii and thus cannot be used to reduce a tortfeasor's available cover

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Arbitration Handbook 2024

    Authors: Hon. William A. Dreier, Robert E. Bartkus

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Ling v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-02-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: J. Scott Key, McDonough, for appellant.
    for defendant: Scott L. Ballard, District Attorney, Thomaston, and Robert W. Smith Jr., Assistant District Attorney, Fayetteville, for appellee.

    Case Number: A09A1271

    When a defendant raises a question in a motion for a new trial as to whether the absence of a qualified interpreter violated the defendants due process rights, the trial court must make and explain

  • Anthony v. Gator Cochran Constr. Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-12-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William J. Williams Johnston, Wilkin & Williams, Augusta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Jay M. Sawilowsky, Augusta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A09A0687

    The Court remanded the case to the trial court after the Supreme Court vacated the Court of Appeals' affirmation of the trial court's ruling that appellants waived their challenge to the verdict as

  • R & R Insulation Servs. Inc. v. Royal Indem. Co.

    Publication Date: 2010-12-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Seth A. Litman, Leslie J. Suson Thompson Hine LLP and Edward M. Newsom Smith, Moore, Leatherwood LLP, Atlanta, for R & R Insulation Services. Michael M. Raeber, William L. Durham II, Jessica E. Sabbath King & Spalding, Michael A. McKenzie, Jefferson C. McConnaughey, Karen D. Fultz Cozen O'Connor, Steven G. Hall Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, Mark D. Aljets Nyemaster, Goode, Voigts, West, Hansell & O'Brien, Des Moines, Jay M. Goldstein Butler, Pappas, Weihmuller, Katz, Craig LLP, Charlotte, N.C., Paul Hines, Alyssa J. Endelman Denenberg Tuffley PLLC, Southfield, Mich., Thomas Paolini, Dana R. Bowling, Michael F. Wallace Law Offices of Robert A. Stutman PC, Berlin, N.J., and M. Yusuf Mohamed, Oakwood, for Royal Indemnity. Edward M. Newsom Smith, Moore, Leatherwood LLP, Atlanta, for Crane.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A10A1537; A10A1538; A10A1539; A10A1540

    While the evidence showed that plaintiff spoliated evidence, and such spoliation prejudiced defendants, the trial court did not err in denying the defendants' motion to for sanctions, specifically d

  • Dover v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-12-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Steven A. Miller, Summerville, for appellant.
    for defendant: Herbert E. Franklin Jr., District Attorney, and Bruce E. Roberts, Assistant District Attorney, LaFayette, for appellee.

    Case Number: A10A1362

    The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence found during an inventory search as the police officer reasonably decided to impound the vehicle, despite the co-defend

  • Brown v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-12-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kimberly L. Copeland, Jesup, for appellant.
    for defendant: Denise D. Fachini, District Attorney, and Cheri L. Nichols, Assistant District Attorney, Cordele, for appellee.

    Case Number: A10A1183

    Case remanded to the trial court with direction to conduct a post-trial USCR 31.3 hearing in accordance with the procedure set forth in White v. State, 213 Ga. App. 429 1994, or to determine whether