• Fosselman v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-10-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Leonard L. Franco Furlong & Franco, Atlanta, and Jeffrey P. Manciagli, Chamblee, for appellant.
    for defendant: Paul L. Howard Jr., District Attorney, and Peggy A. Katz, Senior Assistant District Attorney, Atlanta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A10A0830

    The defendant could not show that trial result would have been different absent trial counsel's alleged deficient perfor

  • State v. Carter

    Publication Date: 2010-09-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paul L. Howard Jr., District Attorney, and John O. Williams, Assistant District Attorney, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Jennifer Lubinsky, Joseph L. Roberto, Dasha M. Jackson, Atlanta, Max C. Richardson Jr. and Heather L. McPhillip, Norcross, for appellees.

    Case Number: A10A0954

    No evidence showed how long the defendants had been at the search house, if they were there with the renter's permission or if they were overnight guests; therefore, the defendants did not have a re

  • Ga. Pines Community Serv. Bd. v. Summerlin

    Publication Date: 2010-09-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, and Jennifer L. Dalton, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Cale H. Conley, Richard A. Griggs Conley Griggs LLP, Atlanta, and C. Frederick Overby Overby Law Office PC, Columbus, for appellee.

    Case Number: A08A1823

    The General Assembly did not include a separate definition of the term employee within the GTCA, the Assembly presumably meant for courts to apply the n law meaning of that term in cases and th

  • Quarterman v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-09-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Timothy L. Edison, Public Defender, and Lisa M. Palmer Public Defender's Office, Cordele, for appellant.
    for defendant: Denise D. Fachini, District Attorney, and Barbara A. Becraft, Assistant District Attorney, Cordele, for appellee.

    Case Number: A10A0851

    No probative evidence supported the defendant's conviction for selling cocaine within 1K feet of a housing project, since the state presented only an officer's testimony that, based on what he had b

  • Thornton v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-09-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jerry Boykin, Atlanta, and Robert L. Mack Jr. Mack & Harris PC, Stockbridge, for appellant.
    for defendant: Patrick H. Head, District Attorney, and Amelia G. Pray, Assistant District Attorney, Marietta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A10A0918

    Trial counsel's strategy of contesting the kidnapping charge, while essentially conceding the lesser charges made the fingerprint analysis immat

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Estate & Trust Litigation 2024

    Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III, Cathleen T. Butler

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Bridges v. Wooten

    Publication Date: 2010-09-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert K. Prater, Newnan, for appellant.
    for defendant: David L. Wooten, Margaret E. Wooten and Eric L. Wooten, Roanoke, Ala., proceeded pro se.

    Case Number: A10A0782

    O.C.G.A. § 51-1-6, upon which the plaintiff relied to establish two defendants' liability, does not create a remedy for the violation of O.C.G.A. § 19-10-1, the criminal statute which prohibits aban

  • Webster v. Desai

    Publication Date: 2010-08-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John G. Mabrey The Mabrey Law Firm PC, Atlanta, and Charles M. Cork III, Macon, for appellant.
    for defendant: Randolph P. Powell Jr. and Erica S. Jansen Huff, Powell & Bailey LLC, Atlanta, for appellees.

    Case Number: A10A0556

    Upon the proper exclusion of the plaintiff's expert, the plaintiff had no expert medical testimony to establish that the defendant's negligence proximately caused her granddaughter's baby's inj

  • Hankla v. Jackson

    Publication Date: 2010-08-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gregory T. Talley and Edward F. Preston Coleman Talley LLP, Valdosta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Laura M. Shamp Brown & Shamp, Atlanta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A10A0077

    Plaintiff's experts were qualified with the exception of her non-medical expert's testimony on the breach of standard of

  • Geiger v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 2010-07-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Julius W. Peek Jr. McRae Stegall & Peek LLP, and Jackson B. Harris, Rome, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Duke R. Groover, Jeanna G. Fennell James, Bates, Pope & Spivey LLP, Macon, and Mark W. Webb Brinson, Askew, Berry, Seigler, Richardson & Davis LLP, Rome, for appellee.

    Case Number: A10A0149

    Que of fact existed regarding whether the co-plaintiff was considered a member of the plaintiffs' household, a term which was not defined in the insurance policy in que

  • Arnold v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-07-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: George T. Jackson Jackson & Schiavone, Savannah, for appellant.
    for defendant: Richard A. Mallard, District Attorney, and Michael T. Muldrew, Assistant District Attorney, Statesboro, for appellee.

    Case Number: A10A0678

    Admission of statement that did not satisfy the test for admissibility as a prior consistent statement did not rise to the level of reversible error, because it was unlikely that the hearsay contrib