Filter This View

  • James v. Flash Foods Inc.

    Publication Date: 2004-05-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Eldridge, Frank M.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bradley J. Survant, W. Carl Reynolds Reynolds & McArthur, Macon, and William P. Keenan, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Thomas Q. Langstaff and Robert B. Langstaff Jr. Langstaff Law Offices, Albany, for appellee.
    Case Number: A04A0920

    Violation of the convenience store's policy of making the register visible from the outside arguably contributed to the likelihood that the store would become the target of an armed ro

  • Alwin v. State

    Publication Date: 2004-05-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Eldridge, Frank M.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Maureen O. Floyd Fleming, Jackson, Ingram & Floyd PC, Augusta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Daniel J. Craig, District Attorney, and Madonna M. Heinemeyer, Assistant District Attorney, Augusta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A04A1133

    The victims testified at the new trial hearing that no member of the defendant's jury was present in the courtroom during his co-defendant's guilty

  • Caesar v. Shelton

    Publication Date: 2004-04-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Eldridge, Frank M.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William J. Edgar, Alma, for appellant.
    for defendant: . William A. Turner Jr., Valdosta, for appellee. Other Party Representation: J. Carol Sherwood Jr. Barham & Dover PC, Valdosta, and Talethia R. Weekley, Waycross.
    Case Number: A04A0717

    The plaintiffs made no attempt to establish the individual defendant's liability by piercing the corporate

  • Paul v. Smith, Gambrell & Russell

    Publication Date: 2004-04-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Eldridge, Frank M.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Frank J. Beltran and Douglas V. Chandler Beltran & Assocs., Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Robert G. Tanner and Shawn D. Scott Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial LLC, Atlanta, for appellees.
    Case Number: A04A0845

    When both conflicts of interest and the judgmental immunity defense are raised, a jury question as to judgmental immunity arises because proof of the existence of a conflict gives rise to the reason

  • Willbanks v. Sugarloaf Cafe Inc. d/b/a Buffalo's Cafe

    Publication Date: 2004-04-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Eldridge, Frank M.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ralph E. Hughes, Decatur, for appellant.
    for defendant: . J. Kenneth Moorman, Rachel A. Fuerst Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial LLC, and Larry G. Cobb Cobb, Grabbe & Spillers, Atlanta, for appellee. Other party representation: William D. Strickland Temple, Strickland, Counts & Dinges, Decatur.
    Case Number: A03A2180

    A jury issue remained as to whether the defendant knew that a drunk driver would soon drive while visibly intoxicated after consuming several glasses of wine at defendant's

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Texas Personal Automobile Insurance Policy 2020

    Authors: Janet K. Colaneri

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Mizell v. State

    Publication Date: 2004-04-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Eldridge, Frank M.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Lee W. Fitzpatrick, Canton, for Mizell. Leonard Danley Danley & Assocs., Douglasville, for Thrower. James D. McDade, District Attorney, Todd S. Boyce, Senior Assistant Solicitor General, James E. Barker, and Christopher R. Johnson, Assistant District Attorneys, Douglasville, for appellee.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A04A0863; A04A0864

    The evidence authorized the jury to find that the defendants were parties to numerous crimes arising from the theft of a motor vehicle and subsequent armed robbery of a convenience

  • Thomas v. State

    Publication Date: 2004-04-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Eldridge, Frank M.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard A. Greenberg, Tallahassee, Fla., for appellant.
    for defendant: J. Brown Moseley, District Attorney, Bainbridge, and Ronald R. Parker, Assistant District Attorney, Camilla, for appellee.
    Case Number: A04A0292

    The fact that a 6-year-old witness felt more comfortable testifying while sitting in his mother's lap did not indicate a lack of r

  • Carter v. State

    Publication Date: 2004-04-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Eldridge, Frank M.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert Greenwald, Norcross, for appellant.
    for defendant: Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, and Mary E. Leonard Gwinnett County District Attorney's Office, Lawrenceville, for appellee.
    Case Number: A04A0773

    Trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to call certain unnamed witnesses on defendant's b

  • Maddox v. State

    Publication Date: 2004-04-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Eldridge, Frank M.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Lynn Wilson, Barnesville, for appellant.
    for defendant: Charles A. Spahos, Solicitor General, Lydia M. Ferguson and Annie C. Deets, Assistant Solicitors General, McDonough, for appellee.
    Case Number: A04A1086

    The arresting officer had probable cause to stop defendant's vehicle after the defendant hit his right hand and knocked loose the flashlight he was holding while waiving traffic out of the Atlanta M

  • Carter v. State

    Publication Date: 2004-04-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Eldridge, Frank M.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James D. Lamb, Columbus, for appellant.
    for defendant: John G. Conger, District Attorney, and Alonza Whitaker, Assistant District Attorney, Columbus, for appellee.
    Case Number: A04A0637

    Jackson v. State, 262 Ga. App. 451 2003, is overruled to the extent it might be interpreted to hold that a witness's opinion testimony as to the identity of a person depicted in a video was admissib