• Greeson v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-10-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kearston M. Gill, Cartersville, for appellant.
    for defendant: Thomas J. Campbell, District Attorney, Cartersville, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, and Christopher R. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellee.

    Case Number: S10A0780

    Evidence of the brutal and savage beating the victim experienced and the defendant's admission that he hit victim and just ' "lost it" ' was sufficient to support his conviction for malice m

  • Lambert v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-10-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jared M. Campbell, Rome, for appellant.
    for defendant: Leigh E. Patterson, District Attorney, Rome, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Sara K. Sahni, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellee.

    Case Number: S10A0878

    Since the evidence of the defendant's guilt was overwhelming, he could not show prejudice from his trial counsel's pursuit of an invalid defense of coe

  • State v. Miller

    Publication Date: 2010-10-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William C. Akins, Assistant District Attorney, Lawrenceville, for appellant.
    for defendant: Jack E. Harrell Jr. Clark & Towne PC, Lawrenceville, and Sharon L. Hopkins, Duluth, for appellee.

    Case Number: S09G1828

    Evidence that may be potentially useful, as the trial court classified the evidence in the present case, is insufficient to support a claim that the defendant's due process rights have been vio

  • Horton v. Johnson

    Publication Date: 2010-09-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Raford Horton, McRae, proceeded pro se. Joseph I. Marchant, Eastman, for appellee.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: S10A1770

    A candidate for was prohibited from running in the primary for County Commissioner pursuant to a local constitutional amendment which deemed county rs ineligible to hold another county

  • Hightower v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-07-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jimmonique R. S. Rodgers Georgia Public Defender Standards Council, Atlanta, for Hightower. Mark T. Phillips, Albany, for Johnson. Gregory W. Edwards, District Attorney, Albany, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Reggie A. Lampkin, Assistant Attorney General, and Kenneth B. Hodges III Baudino Law Group PLC, Atlanta, for appellee.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: S10A0383, S10A0589

    The trial court did not err in allowing test that a witness had expressed his opinion regarding the guilt of certain defendants for the limited purpose of impeaching the witness's test

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Pennsylvania Orphans’ Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Channell v. Houston

    Publication Date: 2010-07-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael S. Green Runyan & Green LLC, Royston, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Brenda H. Trammell, Madison, for appellee. Amicus appellant: James F. Grubiak and Kelly J. Pridgen, Atlanta. Amicus appellee: Charles W. Byrd Walker, Hubert, Gray, Byrd & Christy, Perry, Ted C. Baggett and Susan J. Moore Georgia Mun. Ass'n, Atlanta.

    Case Number: S10A0256

    The power to create special tax districts under Article IX, Section II, Paragraph IV of Georgia Constitution does not embrace creation of special tax district for provision of services of a county s

  • Danbert v. North Ga. Land Ventures LLC

    Publication Date: 2010-07-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James D. Tittle Jr., Hiawassee, for appellant.
    for defendant: Lawrence A. Stockton Jr. Stockton & Stockton LLC, Clayton, and Ronald J. Stay Jr. Stites & Harbison PLLC, Atlanta, for appellees.

    Case Number: S10A0563

    The parties presented conflicting evidence as to whether the public could access an easement road, which the appellants own up to the cente

  • Kendrick v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-07-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas S. Clegg, Decatur, for appellant.
    for defendant: Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, Dawn H. Taylor, Wesley C. Ross, Assistant District Attorneys, Lawrenceville, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, and Sheila E. Gallow, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellee.

    Case Number: S10A0092

    The state could properly impeach the defendant with his prior inconsistent statements, since he chose to speak with the investigating of

  • Klardie v. Klardie

    Publication Date: 2010-07-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Elizabeth J. Kuhn Hait & Eichelzer, Woodstock, for appellant.
    for defendant: Roger M. Johnson Bray & Johnson, Canton, for appellee.

    Case Number: S10F0451

    The doctrine of judicial estoppel did not apply to the wife's claim to a share of her retirement accounts, since the husband did not show that the accounts were not excludable or exempt from the wif

  • Gonzalez v. Crocket

    Publication Date: 2010-07-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jack F. Witcher and Daniel B. Greenfield, Bremen, for appellant.
    for defendant: T. Michael Flinn, Carrollton, for appellee.

    Case Number: S10A0452

    A 21.9-acre parcel of land, which surrounded the parties' 5-acre residential parcel, was not encompassed in their final judgment and divorce decree, and thus remained joint pro