Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
574 results for '* judge:"Hines P Harris"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2005-12-09
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Hines, P. Harris
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sam Crouch, Pelham, proceeded pro se. John G. Conger, District Attorney, Robert B. Bickerstaff II, Assistant District Attorney, Columbus, Mark C. Post, Assistant District Attorney, Hamilton, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, and Julie A. Adams, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellee.
for defendant:
Case Number: S05A0706
The defendant was not entitled to a new trial simply because the trial court's explanation of his right to testify or not was ina
Publication Date: 2005-11-18
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Hines, P. Harris
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Peter C. Canfield, Thomas M. Clyde and Christopher Reilly Dow, Lohnes & Albertson, Atlanta, for appellant.
for defendant: . Robert L. Rothman, Roger A. Chalmers Arnall, Golden Gregory LLP, L. David Wolfe, Bruce S. Harvey, Atlanta, Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, Lawrenceville, District Attorney, Judy C. King King, Lipscomb & Lloyd, Lawrenceville, for appellees.
Case Number: S05A0885
The defendant's appeal of a vacated non-disclosure order, which was entered during the presentation of potential murder charges against him, was
Publication Date: 2005-11-04
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Hines, P. Harris
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stuart A. Kurtz, Marietta, for appellant.
for defendant: Dale A. Wren Carlisle, Wren & McClurg LLP, Sugar Hill, for appellee.
Case Number: S05A0657
The husband's voluntary support for an unrelated child who lived in the parties' home did not obligate him to provide child support in the future, absent an agreement to
Publication Date: 2005-11-04
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Hines, P. Harris
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ronald P. Jayson, Decatur, for appellant.
for defendant: . Gregory T. Presmanes and Amy R. Perkins Bovis, Kyle & Burch LLC, Atlanta, for appellees.
Case Number: S05G0336
The rule of lex loci delicti remains the law of Georgia with regard to the resolution of conflict of laws i
Publication Date: 2005-11-04
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Hines, P. Harris
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mitchell D. Durham, Marietta, for appellant.
for defendant: Patrick H. Head, District Attorney, Dana J. Norman, Assistant District Attorney, Marietta, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, and Vonetta L. Benjamin, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellee.
Case Number: S05A0795
The court's order clarifying that the defendant was entitled to a new on his murder conviction only was not at odds with its previous order granting the defendant a new
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2005-10-28
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Hines, P. Harris
Attorneys: For plaintiff: James W. Howard, Tucker, for appellant.
for defendant: . Cary Ichter, Christopher S. Anulewicz and James L. Hollis Balch & Bingham LLP, Atlanta, for appellees. Other party representation: Edward T. Garland, Robin S. Loeb and Anne H. Coolidge-Kaplan Garland, Samuel & Loeb PC, Atlanta.
Case Number: S05A0765
Mandamus is not an available r to seek review of a trial court's ruling, which is subject to appellate review, because the availability of judicial review is an adequate legal r
Publication Date: 2005-10-14
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Hines, P. Harris
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paul L. Howard Jr., District Attorney, Bettieanne C. Hart, Deputy District Attorney, Ronald S. Boyter Jr., Christopher M. Quinn, Anne E. Green, Assistant District Attorneys, and Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellant.
for defendant: Jonathan R. Melnick, Kimberly A. Dymecki, and Theodore Johnson, Atlanta, for appellees.
Case Number: S05A1206
Even if the photographic line-up was impermissibly suggestive, the trial court erred in excluding the eyewitness's identification of the defendant, since the eyewitness knew the defendant by sight a
Publication Date: 2005-09-30
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Hines, P. Harris
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Samuel G. Merritt, Americus, for appellant.
for defendant: Charles M. Ferguson, District Attorney, Keith W. Day, Assistant District Attorney, Cuthbert, and Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellee.
Case Number: S05A0971
The trial court properly dismissed the defendant's untimely motion to withdraw his Alford
Publication Date: 2005-09-30
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Hines, P. Harris
Attorneys: For plaintiff: James W. Purcell, L. Dean Best and Amy R. Snell Fulcher Hagler LLP, Augusta, for appellant.
for defendant: . James P. Gerard, Patrick T. O'Connor, Christopher L. Ray and Paul H. Threlkeld Oliver, Maner & Gary LLP, Savannah, for appellee. Other party representation: Edward R. Stabell III Brennan, Harris & Rominger, Savannah.
Case Number: S05Q1165
The Court declined to answer certified questions in the plaintiffs' indemnity suit against a city, arising out of a collision between a passenger train and a tractor performing work on a public work
Publication Date: 2005-09-30
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Hines, P. Harris
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard J. Lundy and Charles E. Morris Jr. Parker & Lundy, Cedartown, for appellant.
for defendant: Anthony N. Perrotta and Hannibal F. Heredia Perrotta, Cahn & Prieto PC, Cartersville, for appellee.
Case Number: S05A0722
The clear terms of the parties' support agreement contemplated that the child might not complete his secondary education by his 18 birthday and continued the father's support obligation until the ch
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read