Filter This View

  • Wilson v. State

    Publication Date: 2003-10-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jennifer E. Hildebrand, Lafayette, for appellant.
    for defendant: Herbert E. Franklin Jr., District Attorney, Chris A. Arnt, Assistant District Attorney, Lafayette, Thurbert E. Baker Jr., Attorney General, and Jason C. Fisher, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: S03A0688

    Admission of a testifying witness's prior inconsistent statement did not violate the defendant's confrontation

  • Bradford v. Brown

    Publication Date: 2003-09-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kenneth Bradford, Decatur, proceeded pro se. J. Tom Morgan III, District Attorney, Barbara B. Conroy, Deputy District Attorney, Robert M. Coker, Assistant District Attorney, Decatur, Thurbert E. Baker Jr., Attorney General, and David S. McLaughlin, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellee.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: S03A1178

    O.C.G.A. § 42-5-40 did not bar extradition to Louisiana while he was in the process of appealing his Georgia convic

  • Robinson v. State

    Publication Date: 2003-09-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Steven E. Phillips, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Paul L. Howard Jr., District Attorney, Bettieanne C. Hart, Deputy District Attorney, Thurbert E. Baker Jr., Attorney General, and Madonna M. Heinemeyer, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: S03A1002

    Trial counsel was not deficient for failing to object to the exclusion of irrelevant evidence of the victim's alleged prior

  • Quintana v. State

    Publication Date: 2003-07-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Derek H. Jones, Decatur, for appellant.
    for defendant: Patrick H. Head, District Attorney, Maria B. Golick, Amelia G. Pray, Assistant District Attorneys, Marietta, Thurbert E. Baker Jr., Attorney General, and Jill M. Zubler, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: S03A0227

    The trial court's error in charging on the intent to kill from use of a deadly weapon was harmless, given the overwhelming evidence of m

  • State v. Carlton

    Publication Date: 2003-07-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Herbert E. Franklin Jr., District Attorney, and Chris A. Arnt, Assistant District Attorney, Lafayette, for appellant.
    for defendant: Albert L. Watson III, Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellee.
    Case Number: S02G1175

    An arrest warrant is insufficient to invoke the speedy trial provisions set for in the Interstate Agreement on Deta

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Florida Affirmative Defenses and Procedural Objections: With Forms 2024

    Authors: Joshua B. Spector, Paul D. Turner

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Collins v. State

    Publication Date: 2003-07-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Floyd M. Buford Jr. Buford & Buford, Macon, for appellant.
    for defendant: Howard Z. Simms, District Attorney, Myra H. Kline, Assistant District Attorney, Macon, Thurbert E. Baker Jr., Attorney General, and Adam M. Hames, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: S03A0165

    Trial counsel was not deficient for pursuing the reasonable strategy of placing damaging information about the defendant's prior arrest before the jury through direct examination to portray the defe

  • Mohamed v. State

    Publication Date: 2003-07-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gerard B. Kleinrock, Decatur, for appellant.
    for defendant: J. Tom Morgan III, District Attorney, and Barbara B. Conroy, Deputy District Attorney, Decatur, for appellee.
    Case Number: S03A0083

    O. C.G.A. § 16-9-31 d creates an impermissible mandatory presumption that a defendant has obtained financial transaction cards in violation of subsection a if the defendant has in his possession two

  • Jennings v. McIntosh County Bd. Of Comm'rs

    Publication Date: 2003-07-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sam P. Hensley Jr. Bentley, Bentley & Bentley, Marietta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Adam S. Poppell III, Darien, and James R. Coppage, Brunswick, for appellees.
    Case Number: S03A0135

    A magistrate who prevailed on her main claim against the county board of commissioners and who had to hire outside counsel due to the county attorney's conflict of interest was entitled to recover t

  • Thomas v. State

    Publication Date: 2003-07-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Dwight L. Thomas and Brad Gardner, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Paul L. Howard Jr., District Attorney, Bettieanne C. Hart, Deputy District Attorney, Marc A. Mallon, Ronald S. Boyter, Assistant District Attorneys, Thurbert E. Baker Jr., Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: S03A0499; S03A0637

    The trial court properly dismissed defendant's direct appeal of the denial of his motion to dismiss pending murder charges pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers since the defendant did n

  • Moore v. State

    Publication Date: 2003-07-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bruce S. Moore, Reidsville, proceeded pro se. Bryant G. Speed II, District Attorney, and Fred R. Simpson, Chief Assistant District Attorney, Rome, for appellee.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: S03A0106

    Post-appeal complaints implicating the denial of a criminal defendant's constitutional rights can only be raised in a habeas action in the superior court of the county where the petitioner is det