• Williamson v. Williamson

    Publication Date: 2010-02-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bert S. Harp Jr. Harp & Johnson and Amy C. Walters Hagler Henderson & Jackson, Columbus, for appellant.
    for defendant: Lynn L. Grogan, Columbus, for appellee.

    Case Number: A09A1767

    The law favors legitimacy and the mother failed to make a threshold showing that delegitimation was in her child's best int

  • Taylor v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-01-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Patricia F. Angeli, Jonesboro, for appellant.
    for defendant: Tracy G. Lawson, District Attorney, and Dawn M. Belisle-Skinner, Assistant District Attorney, Jonesboro, for appellee.

    Case Number: A10A0007

    Any error in the photographic lineup identification procedure was harmless, because the defendant claimed that the victim misidentifie

  • Fortner v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.

    Publication Date: 2010-01-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kathryn H. Pinckney, Robert B. Turner Savage, Turner, Pinson & Karsman, Savannah, David F. Walbert Parks, Chesin, Walbert & Miller, Atlanta, and Marion T. Pope Jr. Hasty Pope LLC, Canton, for appellant.
    for defendant: Robert R. Gunn II, Thomas P. Allen III, John S. Edwards Martin Snow LLP, Macon, and Irman G. Hodges Oliver Maner LLP, Savannah, for appellee. Other party representation: Jason L. Crawford Daugherty, Crawford, Fuller & Brown LLP, Columbus.

    Case Number: A08A0983

    The trial court's jury charge was not consistent with the safe harbor provision recognized in Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Brightman, 276 Ga. 683

  • State v. Long

    Publication Date: 2010-01-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Patrick H. Head, District Attorney, Dana J. Norman, Henry R. Thompson, Assistant District Attorneys, and John R. Edwards District Attorney's Office, Marietta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Steven A. Cook and John R. Greco, Marietta, for appellees.

    Case Number: A09A2196

    After the defendant refused his consent to search, the officer unreasonably prolonged the defendant's detention while waiting for the K-9 unit to a

  • Harris v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-01-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Suesan A. Miller Ricky W. Morris Jr. PC, McDonough, for appellant.
    for defendant: Charles A. Spahos, Solicitor General, and Brian M. Johnston, Assistant Solicitor General, McDonough, for appellee.

    Case Number: A10A0119

    The officers had probable cause to arrest the defendant for DUI, even without the HGN test r , due to his erratic driving, alcohol odor, red and watery eyes and positive alco-sensor test r

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Delaware County Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Techbios Inc. v. Champagne

    Publication Date: 2009-12-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Frederick S. Sugarman and Alexandra M. Dishun The Bloom Law Firm LLP, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Stephen M. Katz The Katz Law Group, Marietta, for appellees.

    Case Number: A09A2270

    The plaintiff's complaint sufficiently raises possible claims of recovery against the defendants for fraud, breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing and breach of a

  • Sapp v. Canal Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 2009-12-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen R. Chance and Lance D. Lourie Watkins, Lourie, Roll & Chance PC, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Robert W. Browning, Charles A. Ratz Gilliland, Ratz & Browning PC, Atlanta, John C. Spurlin Spurlin & Spurlin, Robert C. Wilmot McCall, Phillips, Williams & Powell LLC, Tifton, and William H. Hedrick, Albany, for appellee.

    Case Number: A09A2317

    The insurer was not liable for a collision between its insured and the plaintiff, since the covered vehicle was subject to a limitation of use specifically limiting the policy coverage to 50 miles f

  • Mucyo v. Publix Super Markets Inc.

    Publication Date: 2009-12-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Andrew J. Hinton Jr. Hinton & Powell, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Jennifer L. Nichols Fain, Major & Brennan PC, Atlanta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A09A2343

    The defendant did not have constructive knowledge of the clear substance on which the plaintiff slipped and fell while shopping at the defendant's grocery

  • Ball v. Jones

    Publication Date: 2009-12-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas E. Lavender III The Weathington Firm PC, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: H. Lehman Franklin Jr., Statesboro, Glenn P. Hendrix, Robert T. Strang Arnall, Golden & Gregory LLP, James D. Johnson Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers LLP, Atlanta, Wiley A. Wasden III, and Tracie G. Smith Brennan & Wasden LLP, Savannah, for appellees.

    Case Number: A09A2049

    O.C.G.A. § 9-11-9.1 g explicitly categorizes nurses and physical therapists as separate profes

  • Krepps v. State

    Publication Date: 2009-12-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bryan M. Grantham, Public Defender, Augusta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Rebecca A. Wright, District Attorney, Madonna M. Little and Charles R. Sheppard, Assistant District Attorneys, Augusta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A09A2404

    The defendant called the victim repeatedly in violation of his probation on an aggravated stalking conviction for making harassing phone calls to the victim and the victim testified that the calls c