Filter This View

  • Fortis Ins. Co. v. Kahn

    Publication Date: 2009-06-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Mikell, Charles B.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gregory F. Harley Burr & Forman LLP, Atlanta, and Frank G. Burt Jorden Burt LLP, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
    for defendant: . Roy E. Barnes, John R. Bevis The Barnes Law Group, Marietta, Philip W. Savrin, Jacob E. Daly Freeman, Mathis & Gary LLP, Atlanta, L. Andrew Hollis and Steven W. Couch Hollis & Wright PC, Birmingham, Ala., for appellee.
    Case Number: A09A0486

    The trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that common i of law and fact predominate over individual i

  • Reddick v. State

    Publication Date: 2009-06-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Mikell, Charles B.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ronald R. Parker, Assistant Pub. Defender, Bainbridge, for appellant.
    for defendant: Joseph K. Mulholland, District Attorney, J. Brian Rutland and Charles E. Rooks, Assistant District Attorneys, Bainbridge, for appellee.
    Case Number: A09A0795

    The admission of the drug identification testimony did not violate the defendant's right to confrontation, since the crime lab expert directed the testing and personally reviewed the test re

  • Ellison v. Southstar Energy Servs. LLC

    Publication Date: 2009-06-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Mikell, Charles B.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jason R. Doss The Doss Firm LLC, Marietta, Anne W. Lewis and Frank B. Strickland Strickland Brockington Lewis LLC, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Robert B. Remar, Jill E. Steinberg and Kimberly L. Myers Rogers & Hardin LLP, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A09A0701

    The voluntary payment doctrine did not bar the plaintiffs' claims based on alleged violations of the Natural Gas Competition and Deregulatio

  • Grange Mut. Cas. Co. v. Snipes

    Publication Date: 2009-06-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Mikell, Charles B.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edward R. Stabell III Brennan, Harris & Rominger, Savannah, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Morton G. Forbes, Johnny A. Foster Forbes, Foster & Poole, Savannah, Bobby T. Jones Jones & Smith PC, Metter, and George H. Rountree, Statesboro, for appellees.
    Case Number: A09A0020

    The defendants in the underlying injury action timely elected coverage under the insurer's policy as additional ins

  • Ransom v. State

    Publication Date: 2009-06-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Mikell, Charles B.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Pamela T. Britt, Grayson, for appellant.
    for defendant: Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, and Jon W. Setzer District Attorney's Office, Lawrenceville, for appellee.
    Case Number: A09A0421

    Evidence of the defendant's escalating obsession with the victim and threatening phone calls to her, as well as a kerosene-soaked, partially burned, mailing label addressed to the defendant found on

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Enforcement of Judgments: A Practitioner’s Guide to Recovery

    Authors: Dennis S. Ellis, Katherine F. Murray, Nicholas J. Begakis, Adam M. Reich

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Hollie v. State

    Publication Date: 2009-06-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Mikell, Charles B.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mark A. Yurachek The Law Offices of Mark A. Yurachek & Assoc., Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, and Jimmie E. Baggett Jr., Assistant District Attorney, Lawrenceville, for appellee.
    Case Number: A09A0667

    The defendant was not entitled to notice of the sex offender registration requirement, since designation of a person as a sexual offender is a regulatory mechanism and status resulting from the con

  • Skinner v. State

    Publication Date: 2009-05-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Mikell, Charles B.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Clinton L. Lott IV, Assistant Public Defender, Fitzgerald, for appellant.
    for defendant: Denise D. Fachini, District Attorney, and Matthew P. Brown District Attorney's Office, Cordele, for appellee.
    Case Number: A09A0773

    The defendant entered his Alford plea to statutory rape and cocaine distribution voluntarily, knowingly and intellig

  • Abdul-Malik v. AirTran Airways Inc.

    Publication Date: 2009-05-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Mikell, Charles B.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Herald J. Alexander Alexander Law Firm PC, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Matthew W. Clarke, Caitlin E. Bannigan Smith, Gambrell & Russell LLP, and James T. Brieske, Atlanta, for appellees.
    Case Number: A09A0396

    The plaintiff failed to provide evidence to contradict the defendants' testimony on the dispositive issue of whether they fabricated e-mails in which the plaintiff was accused of making a terroristi

  • State v. Brawner

    Publication Date: 2009-05-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Mikell, Charles B.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paul L. Howard Jr., District Attorney, and Marc A. Mallon, Senior Assistant District Attorney, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Monique R. Walker and Ashleigh B. Merchant Public Defender's Office, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A09A0578

    No evidence showed that police acted in bad faith in failing to preserve a surveillance videotape, which had no apparent exculpatory

  • Airport Auth. of the City of St. Marys Ga. v. City of St. Marys

    Publication Date: 2009-05-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Mikell, Charles B.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James E. Stein, St. Marys, for appellant.
    for defendant: Amanda B. Blackledge City of St. Marys, for appellee.
    Case Number: A09A0786

    The appellant's ai least with the city obligated the appellant to heed the city's directives, including the city's resolution to pursue relocation of the ai