Filter This View

  • In the Interest of J.D.

    Publication Date: 2000-06-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph W. Jones Jr., Greenville, for appellant.
    for defendant: Peter J. Skandalakis, District Attorney, LaGrange, and Brett E. Pinion, Assistant District Attorney, Newnan, for appellee.
    Case Number: A00A0855

    The 6-year-old victims' statements and the testimony of an accomplice that the juvenile threatened to beat the first victim up after he made that victim perform oral sex and that he "humped" the sec

  • Brown v. State

    Publication Date: 2000-06-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sharon L. Hopkins, Lawrenceville, for appellant.
    for defendant: Paul L. Howard Jr., District Attorney, and Bettieanne C. Hart, Assistant District Attorney, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A00A0180

    The trial court was not required to strike a potential juror who had strong fee against illegal drugs, since the juror said that he would decide the case without regard to those fee

  • Nash v. State of Georgia

    Publication Date: 2000-06-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: O. Jackson Cook The Cook Law Office, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Paul L. Howard Jr., District Attorney, Gary S. Hulsey, Christopher M. Quinn, Assistant District Attorneys, Atlanta, and Harvey D. Harkness Awtrey & Parker, Marietta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A00A0713

    The actual date of seizure is not counted for purposes of determining the running of the 60-day limitation period for filing a forfeiture pet

  • In the Interest of A.D.

    Publication Date: 2000-06-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James B. McGee III McGee & McGee, Waycross, for appellant.
    for defendant: Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Dennis R. Dunn, Deputy Attorney General, Shalen A. Sgrosso, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, and Charles R. Reddick Charles R. Reddick PC, Homerville, for appellee.
    Case Number: A00A0118

    Evidence that mother was dominated by her husband and did nothing to protect her children from his sexual abuse supported the termination of her parental r

  • Tom's Amusement Co. Inc. v. Total Vending Servs.

    Publication Date: 2000-05-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: R. Leslie Waycaster Jr., Dalton, Steven M. Staes and John A. Sherrill McCullough Sherrill LLP, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Edwin A. Tate II, Sanford R. Karesh Seacrest, Karesh, Tate & Bicknese, Atlanta, and Lawrence C. Walker Jr. Walker, Hulbert, Gray & Byrd, Perry, for appellees.
    Case Number: A99A1753

    Employer could not bring a tortious interference claim against its employee who supplied confidential information to its competitor, since employee was not a stranger to the business relationship be

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Infobeans Book Publication test

    Authors: Stephen Fishman

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • State v. Coe

    Publication Date: 2000-05-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ralph T. Bowden Jr., Solicitor, Gwendolyn R. Keyes, Solicitor General, Lauren E. Waller and Thomas E. Csider, Assistant Solicitors, Decatur, for appellant.
    for defendant: Steven P. Berne, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A99A1751

    Police officer did not have to give a Miranda warning to DUI arrestee before asking him to submit to a state-administered urine test after he had taken a blood test. The contrary holding in State v.

  • Hutchins v. State

    Publication Date: 2000-05-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: J. Michael Bass Closson, Bass & Tomberlin, Valdosta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Richard W. Shelton, Solicitor, for appellee.
    Case Number: A99A2355

    Trial court could not impose probation for the 60 days that defendant's confinement was shortened due to "good time" c

  • Pacific Grove Holding LLC v. Hardy

    Publication Date: 2000-05-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Nicholas S. Papleacos Shapiro, Fussell, Wedge, Smotherman & Marti, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Jeffrey B. Talley Jeffrey V. Talley & Assocs. PC, Dallas, and Charles L. Davis Jr. Talley & Darden, Marietta, for appellee. Other party representation: Charles E. Buker III Perrie, Thompson & Buker PC.
    Case Number: A99A1928

    Jury questions remain as to whether seller orally waived time of performance in option con

  • Woods v. State of Georgia

    Publication Date: 2000-05-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: George C. Creal Jr., Morrow, for appellant.
    for defendant: Robert E. Keller, District Attorney, and Rita B. Jackson, Assistant District Attorney, Jonesboro, for appellee.
    Case Number: A99A2190

    Trial courts should not receive or consider motions to strike or dismiss during unreported calendar calls because the calendar calls do not constitute hearings or trials under the Civil Practic

  • Brandon v. Newman

    Publication Date: 2000-05-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Keith F. Brandon Zimmerman & Assocs., Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Samuel W. Cruse, Augusta, for appellee. Other party representation: Elizabeth McLeod Fulcher, Hagler, Reed, Hanks & Harper, Augusta.
    Case Number: A99A1776

    The plaintiff could not enforce his attorney's lien against the defendant's personal injury settlement because the underlying retainer agreement was inexplicably entwined with an unethical fee-split