• Smith v. KLS Constr. Co. Inc.

    Publication Date: 2001-02-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Phipps, Herbert E.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Eugene C. Brooks IV, Savannah, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Rebecca C. Benton, Pooler, Tracy O'Connell Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Bart LLP, Savannah, and John C. Amabile Pursley, Howell, Lowery & Meeks LLP, Atlanta, for appellee. Other party representation: Paul A. Howell Jr. Pursley, Howell, Lowery & Meeks LLP, Atlanta.

    Case Number: A00A1794

    The 6-year statute of limitation governing simple written contracts applied to the plaintiff's suit against their builder arising out of the builder's use of synthetic s

  • Stephens v. Greensboro Properties Ltd. LP

    Publication Date: 2001-02-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Phipps, Herbert E.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David G. Kopp, Greensboro, and Jesse Copelan Jr., Eatonton, for appellant.
    for defendant: . E. Davidson Burch and Matthew A. Moseley Blasingame, Burch, Garrard, Bryant & Ashley, Athens, for appellees.

    Case Number: A00A2491

    Evidence that a apartment management company authorized a known felon to engage in security-related activities raised a jury question as to whether his assault on a tenant was forese

  • Jorisch v. Rhythm Festival Inc. a/k/a Rhythm Fest

    Publication Date: 2001-02-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Phipps, Herbert E.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paula Jorisch, Washington, D.C., proceeded pro se. Thomas D. Trask, Noah H. Pines Dennis, Corry & Porter LLP, J. Franklin Burns and Christine A. Carson Gorby, Reeves, Peters & Burns, Atlanta, for appellee.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A00A2122

    A company that rented modified vans for use in transporting disabled passengers did not provide specified public transportation service or operate a demand responsive or fixed route system with the

  • Kueffer Crane & Hoist Serv. Inc. v. Passarella

    Publication Date: 2001-01-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Phipps, Herbert E.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: J. Michael McGarity and Howard W. Reese III McGarity & Associates, Lawrenceville, for appellant.
    for defendant: Neil A. Moskowitz, Atlanta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A00A1153

    An oral agreement by an employer to transfer corporate stock to an employee for non-monetary consideration is not a 'sale' within the meaning of UCC § 11-

  • Lighting Galleries Inc. v. Drummond

    Publication Date: 2001-01-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Phipps, Herbert E.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jay M. Sawilowsky, Augusta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Leland M. Malchow Nimmons & Malchow, Augusta, for appellees. Other party representation: Robert P. Sentell III Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, William J. Williams and Wendell E. Johnston Jr. Johnston, Wilkin & Williams, Augusta.

    Case Number: A00A1123

    Non-compete agreement was unenforceable because the employee was transferred out of the restricted territory nearly a year before he res

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Corporate Internal Investigations

    Authors: Steven F. Molo, Dan K. Webb, Robert W. Tarun

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • A & D Asphalt Co. Inc. v. Carroll & Carroll of Macon Inc.

    Publication Date: 2001-01-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Phipps, Herbert E.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: L. Robert Lovett Lovett, Cowart & Ayerbe LLC, Macon, for appellant.
    for defendant: . James A. Vaughn Vaughn, Wright & Stearns LLP, Forsyth, and Frederick L. Wright II, Atlanta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A00A1192

    Even if the plaintiff's first letter exercising its option to purchase leased property was ineffective, the letter did not constitute a rejection of the option which remained in effect throughout t

  • Betts v. Medcross Imaging Ctr. Inc.

    Publication Date: 2001-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Phipps, Herbert E.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Leslie E. Stewart Maple Street Law Offices, Decatur, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Lawrence L. Bennett Jr. Drew, Eckl & Farnham, Atlanta, for appellees.

    Case Number: A00A1553

    The plaintiffs' claims for emotional distress arising out of their on-the-job exposure to radiation were barred by the exclusivity provisions of Georgia's Workers' Compensatio

  • Clark v. State

    Publication Date: 2001-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Phipps, Herbert E.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Virgil L. Brown, Eric D. Hearn, Bentley C. Adams III and Larkin M. Lee Virgil Brown & Assocs., Zebulon, for appellant.
    for defendant: Louis J. Kirby, Solicitor General, LaGrange, for appellee.

    Case Number: A00A0969

    The trial court properly refused to remove for cause a prospective juror who was represented in his divorce action by the law office of a part-time county solicitor who did not participate in the de

  • Allen v. State

    Publication Date: 2001-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Phipps, Herbert E.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Steven H. Sadow, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: James D. McDade, District Attorney and William H. McClain, Assistant District Attorney, Douglasville, for appellee.

    Case Number: A00A0920

    Defendants must be given the opportunity to impeach the credibility of declarants whose statements are admitted under the medical diagnosis or treatment exception to the hearsay

  • Peake v. State

    Publication Date: 2001-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Phipps, Herbert E.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James S. Lewis, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Patrick H. Head, District Attorney, Maria B. Golick and Thomas A. Cole, Assistant District Attorneys, Marietta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A00A1199

    The trial court properly recharged the jury on conspiracy without recharging on mere presence and mere associ