Filter This View

  • Ward v. State

    Publication Date: 2000-03-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Smith, George T.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Willie C. Weaver Weaver Law Offices, Albany, for appellant.
    for defendant: Kenneth B. Hodges III, District Attorney, and Richard E. Thomas, Assistant District Attorney, Albany, for appellee.
    Case Number: A99A2270

    A videotape of the perpetrator and testimony regarding the stolen merchandise corroborated the defendant's confession that he entered the grocery store with a shirt over his head and stole beer and

  • Nelson v. State

    Publication Date: 2000-03-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Smith, George T.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Orin L. Alexis, Savannah, for appellant.
    for defendant: Spencer Lawton Jr., District Attorney, and Ann M. Elmore, Assistant District Attorney, Savannah, for appellee.
    Case Number: A99A1964

    The trial court properly admitted defendant's prior robbery by force conviction, since the fact that it occurred 11 years ago did not make it dissimilar to the present armed robbery charges agains

  • In the Interest of J.S.G.

    Publication Date: 2000-03-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Smith, George T.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Harold J. Choate III White & Choate, Cartersville, for appellant.
    for defendant: Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, William C. Joy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Shalen A. Sgrosso, Velma C. Tilley and Dennis R. Dunn, Assistant Attorneys General, Atlanta, for appellee. Other party representation: Garland Lea, Cartersville, and John C. Shelton, Atlanta.
    Case Number: A99A1908

    Mother's failure to establish a stable home, to obtain stable employment, or to cease residing with an illegal alien as required by her reunification plan supported termination of her parental right

  • Hazelwood v. Adams

    Publication Date: 2000-03-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Smith, George T.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John S. Husser Mundy & Gammage PC, Cedartown, for appellant.
    for defendant: Steven J. Misner and Donald J. Grate Law Offices of Richard W. Littlefield Jr., Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A98A0971

    The Court of Appeals adopted the Supreme Court's judgment that a high school football coach was immune from a suit arising out of his disciplining the plaintiff for vand

  • Smithson v. Parker

    Publication Date: 2000-03-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Smith, George T.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James T. White and Brendan J. McCarthy Varner, Stephens, Humphries & White LLP, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: R. Ann Grier Mozley, Finlayson & Loggins and Melvin Drukman, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A99A1796

    Trial court could not direct a defense verdict since the parties presented conflicting evidence as to whether defendant committed fraud or breached a contract in providing a substandard wedding dres

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Library of Connecticut Personal Injury Forms and Commentary, 3rd Edition

    Authors: KOSKOFF KOSKOFF, BIEDER PC, CAREY B. REILLY

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • O'Hara v. State

    Publication Date: 2000-02-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Smith, George T.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William J. Mason, Columbus, for appellant.
    for defendant: John G. Conger, District Attorney, and Alonza Whitaker, Assistant District Attorney, Columbus, for appellee.
    Case Number: A99A1791

    Trial judge's friendly conversation with a police officer during his examination by the state was not a comment on that officer's credib

  • State v. McTaggart

    Publication Date: 2000-02-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Smith, George T.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Herbert E. Franklin Jr., District Attorney, and Melodie S. Bedford, LaFayette, for appellant.
    for defendant: Sam F. Little Little, Adams, Bates & Kelehear PC, Dalton, for appellee.
    Case Number: A99A1726

    Defendant who told police investigating a dog attack at his home, "do what you have to do and lock the gate when you're done" as he ran to his vehicle to meet the attack victim at the hospital did n

  • Martinez v. State

    Publication Date: 2000-02-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Smith, George T.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Christopher T. Adams, Lawrenceville, for appellant.
    for defendant: Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, and James M. Miskell, Assistant District Attorney, Lawrenceville, for appellee.
    Case Number: A99A1815

    Defendant waived his objection to detective's testimony since he merely raised an anticipatory objection before the detective took the stand and did not object at the time the detective test

  • Rivers v. Almand

    Publication Date: 2000-02-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Smith, George T.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Arthur M. Washington Clark & Washington, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Mitchel S. Evans Crim & Bassler, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A99A1769

    The Court of Appeals sanctioned the plaintiff's attorney for appealing the dismissal of her complaint after she failed to respond to any discovery or appear at her noticed depos

  • Rolling Pin Kitchen Emporium Inc. v. Kaas

    Publication Date: 2000-02-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Smith, George T.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Everett W. Gee III and Carl L. Meyer Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Shawn A. Kachmar Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough LLP, Charleston, S.C., and Charles T. Huddleston Arnall, Golden & Gregory, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A99A2415

    The existence of subordination agreements between the plaintiff and other creditors of the defendants did not affect the plaintiff's right to recover against the defendants for debts arising from th