• In re Cardinal Health Inc. Securities Litigation, C2-04-575

    Publication Date: 2007-02-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2007-01-26
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Robert Patterson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: C2-04-575

    District Judge Robert P. Patterson, Jr. U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Patterson Non-party Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP (

  • Moses Production Inc. v. Sweetland Films B.V., 602330-01

    Publication Date: 2006-08-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2006-07-31
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County
    Judge: Bernard Fried
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 602330-01

    NEW YORK COUNTY Supreme Court For Plaintiff: Michael P. Zweig For Defendant: Steven Hayes Justice Fried a href="http://nycourts.law.com/cpnylj/judg

  • Mother Zion Tenant Assn. v Donovan

    Publication Date: 2008-10-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 3502

    Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, Buckley, Catterson, JJ. 3502 Index 402239/06 Mother Zion Tenant Association, et al. Petitioners-Appellants, v Shaun Donovan, Commission

  • United States v. Elson

    Publication Date: 2009-09-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-08-21
    Court: 6th Cir.
    Judge: Clay, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-3778

    RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206Argued: June 18, 2009Before: KEITH, CLAY, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.OPINIONDefendant Martin W. Elson appeals the r

  • Matter of Acosta v New York City Dept. of Educ.

    Publication Date: 2009-05-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 4407

    Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Nardelli, Buckley, Freedman, JJ. 4407 Index 400475/07 In re Madeline Acosta, Petitioner-Appellant, v The New York City Department

  • New York Cooling Towers Inc. v. Goidel

    Publication Date: 2005-07-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    QUEENS COUNTY Supreme Court Justice Kelly This action has its origin in a dispute that arose between the present plaintiff New York Cooling Towers, Inc. ("Cooling Towe

  • Matter of RICHARD E.

    Publication Date: 2004-11-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 96494

    Decided and Entered: November 24, 2004 96494 In the Matter of RICHARD E., Alleged to be Mentally Retarded. JOSEPH J. COLARUSSO, as Director of Sunmount Developmental Disabilities S

  • Perez v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-09-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-09-08
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 7
    Judge: Patrick A. Pirtle Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-08-0425-CR

    Before QUINN, C.J. and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.OPINIONFollowing an open plea of guilty to the offense of murder,*fn1 Appellant, Alfredo Perez, was adjudicated g

  • Matter of New York Temporary State Commission on Lobbying v. Crane, 503134

    Publication Date: 2008-03-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge: Kavanagh
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 503134

    APPELLATE DIVISION THIRD DEPARTMENT Dreyer Boyajian, L.L.P., Albany (William J. Dreyer of counsel), for appellant. Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Davi

  • Multi-Juice SA v. Snapple Beverage Corp.

    Publication Date: 2003-05-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Judge Patterson MULTI-JUICE, S.A. v. SNAPPLE BEVERAGE CORP. — Defendants Snapple Beverage Corp. (“Snapple”), Mistic Brand . (“Mistic”) and Triarc Companie