• Comcast Corp. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n

    Publication Date: 2020-03-11
    Practice Area: Patent Litigation
    Industry: Electronics
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Pauline Newman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Donald B. Verrilli, JR., Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all appellants. Appellants Comcast Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, Comcast Business Communications, LLC, Comcast Holdings Corporation, Comcast Shared Services, LLC also represented by Ginger Anders; David Lisson, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLC, Menlo Park, CA; Steven Anzalone, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC.
    for defendant: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by Ronald Traud, Dominic L. Bianchi, Wayne W. Herrington. Jeffrey A. Lamken, MoloLamken LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenors. Also represented by Michael Gregory Pattillo, JR., Rayiner Hashem; Roderick George Dorman, McKool Smith PC, Los Angeles, CA; Joshua Wright Budwin, Joel Lance Thollander, Austin, TX; Douglas Aaron Cawley, Dallas, TX; John M. Whealan, Chevy Chase, MD. Mitchell G. Stockwell, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, for appellants ARRIS Enterprises, Inc., ARRIS Global Ltd., ARRIS Group, Inc., ARRIS International plc, ARRIS Solutions, Inc., ARRIS Technology, Inc., Pace Americas, LLC. Also represented by Joshua Hamilton Lee, Michael Turton; Matthew Meyer, Menlo Park, CA; Joshua B. Pond, Washington, DC. Paul M. Bartkowski, Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg, LLP, Washington, DC, for appellants Technicolor, S.A., Technicolor Connected Home USA LLC, Technicolor USA, Inc. John Thorne, Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C., Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Verizon Services Corp. Also represented by Gregory G. Rapawy, Ariela M. Migdal.

    Case Number: 2018-1450

    Comcast's X1 Boxes Infringed on Patents After Importation Contrary to Tariff Act §337