• Webb v. Scranton Quincy Hosp. Co. LLC

    Publication Date: 2024-04-26
    Practice Area: Medical Malpractice
    Industry: Health Care
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
    Judge: Judge Nealon
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2021 CV 4073

    The trial court granted a motion in limine filed by plaintiffs in anticipation of opening statements in a medical malpractice case that sought leave of court to use admissible excerpts of videotaped depositions of defense witnesses they did not identify.

  • Palumbo v. AMPCO Pittsburgh

    Publication Date: 2024-04-26
    Practice Area: Wrongful Death
    Industry: Construction | Manufacturing
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
    Judge: Judge Fletman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1665

    In a §1925(a) opinion, the court urged the Superior Court to affirms its order granting summary judgment to defendant and denying plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration in a wrongful death matter where plaintiffs failed to submit sufficient evidence including expert testimony to overcome summary judgment.

  • Truong v. Nghiem

    Publication Date: 2024-04-26
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas
    Judge: Judge Powell
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 00472

    In this §1925(a) opinion, the trial court asked the Superior Court to affirm its orders granting motions in limine that precluded the plaintiff in a motor vehicle collision case from introducing evidence concerning her future medical expenses and treatment for her permanent injuries and precluding presentation of testimony or evidence concerning a medial branch block and radio ablation that she underwent more than two years after her initial treatment.

  • HPMC Solutions, LLC v. Weidow

    Publication Date: 2024-04-26
    Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
    Industry: Financial Services and Banking
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
    Judge: Judge Nealon
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2017 CV 1103

    The court denied plaintiff's motion seeking to reinstate a mortgage foreclosure action pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P. 230.2(d)(3) after the case had been terminated pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P. 1025 and Lacka. Co. R.C.P. 200(c) and 200.1(a).

  • Blount v. Francis

    Publication Date: 2024-04-26
    Practice Area: Contracts
    Industry: Real Estate
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
    Judge: Judge Coyle
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 02758

    Appellant challenged the court's order granting a party's motion to enforce a settlement agreement in consolidated proceedings. The court held that it properly granted the motion where the opposing party agreed to a negotiated settlement but later claimed to have unilaterally revoked the agreement without notice to any party.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Pennsylvania Orphans’ Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • DiMeo v. Gross

    Publication Date: 2024-04-26
    Practice Area: Medical Malpractice
    Industry: Health Care
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
    Judge: Judge Jacquinto
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 191003447

    Appellants challenged the court's order denying their post-trial motion and entering judgment in favor of appellee. The court concluded the appeal should be denied and its judgment affirmed where, among other things, there was no error in the court's rejection of appellants' request that trial be delayed by one day to accommodate an appellant's observation of Yom Kippur.

  • Tomasko v. Citrin, Cooperman & Co.

    Publication Date: 2024-04-26
    Practice Area: Damages
    Industry: Accounting | Legal Services
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
    Judge: Judge Erdos
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 220201441

    Appellant appealed the court's order finding in favor of appellees in his action to recover amounts allegedly due after an independent accounting conducted pursuant to a pretrial settlement of a business dispute. The court requested that its order be affirmed where the independent accountant's report failed to state that specific parties owed specific amounts to other specific parties and thus appellant failed to support his claim by a preponderance of the evidence.

  • Kleiner v. Johnson & Johnson

    Publication Date: 2024-04-26
    Practice Area: Products Liability
    Industry: Consumer Products | Manufacturing
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
    Judge: Judge Anders
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 170102505

    Product liability plaintiffs appealed the court's order denying their motion for post-trial relief. The court held that it properly limited or struck testimony by two of plaintiffs' experts where one expert relied upon a statistical analysis of a non-testifying colleague and the other provided a supplemental opinion report a mere month before trial.

  • Hamilton Twp. v. Gimadeyev

    Publication Date: 2024-04-19
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
    Judge: Judge Wood
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 7844 CV 2022

    The court granted defendant's motion for reconsideration of its order denying defendant's motion to open a default judgment.

  • Amres Corp. v. Ayzenberg

    Publication Date: 2024-04-19
    Practice Area: Expert Witnesses
    Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Accounting
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
    Judge: Judge Trauger
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2022-01224 (Consolidated)

    Certain parties appealed the court's decision allowing a certified public accountant, who served as a court-appointed forensic accounting expert in the parties' litigation, to seek payment of his expert fees within the parties' litigation rather than filing a separate action. The court requested that its decision be affirmed where the parties had clearly agreed to split the cost of the appointed expert that the parties ultimately required to value the disputed multimillion dollar assets involved in the complex commercial case.