• McWilliams v. McWilliams

    Publication Date: 2024-10-11
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Murray
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 211 WDA 2024

    Trial court correctly determined that grounds for divorce had not been established before spouse's death where spouse died less than 20 days after filing an affidavit establishing grounds for divorce and the other spouse did not affirmatively admit the allegations in the affidavit. Order of the trial court affirmed.

  • Kowall v. United States Steel Corp., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-10-11
    Practice Area: Environmental Law
    Industry: Manufacturing
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Nichols
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 844 WDA 2023

    Appellants appealed the trial court's denial of their motions for summary judgment. The court affirmed, holding in pertinent part that property owners stated Hazardous Sites Cleanup Act damages claims where their counsel had paid for environmental testing costs to determine the presence and extent of hazardous contamination caused by a metal refinery owned by defendants' predecessor. The court held further that the HSCA did not preclude plaintiffs from seeking recovery of future environmental contamination response costs.

  • Commonwealth v. Sandusky

    Publication Date: 2024-10-04
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stevens
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1059 MDA 2023

    Appellant appealed the post-conviction relief court's order denying his motion for a new trial based on after-discovered evidence, which appellant argued showed that an attorney and psychologist used unduly suggestive techniques when interviewing his alleged child sexual abuse victims. The court affirmed, holding that the post-conviction relief court properly denied appellant's motion without an evidentiary hearing where he failed to show that his after-discovered evidence would be used for a purpose other than impeaching a witness's

  • Commonwealth v. Myers

    Publication Date: 2024-10-04
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1120 MDA 2022

    Court disputed whether including prior felony conviction used in an offense gravity score as part of the defendant's prior record score constituted impermissible "double counting." Judgment of sentence affirmed.

  • Commonwealth v. McCormick

    Publication Date: 2024-10-04
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge McLaughlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1116 WDA 2023

    Appellant appealed the trial court's judgment of sentence entered on her conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance-metabolite of a substance. The court affirmed, holding that the statute under which appellant was convicted was not unconstitutionally vague in forbidding operation of a motor vehicle with a metabolite of a controlled substance in one's blood.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Lancaster County & Berks County Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • In the Interest of: K.T.

    Publication Date: 2024-10-04
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Murray
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 324 WDA 2024

    Trial court had sufficient evidence to involuntarily terminate parental rights where mother proved incapable of remedying her substance abuse issues and expert testimony found child had a stronger, healthier bond with her foster parent. Order of the trial court affirmed.

  • Commonwealth v. Williams

    Publication Date: 2024-10-04
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Lazarus
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2320 EDA 2023

    Appellant appealed the trial court's order dismissing his petition under the Post Conviction Relief Act. The court affirmed, holding that the PCRA court erred by considering the merits of appellant's fatally untimely ineffectiveness of counsel claims. The court held further that the PCRA court properly denied appellant's claim seeking a new trial on the basis of after-acquired evidence where appellant failed to show that the evidence, consisting of unrelated disciplinary action against a testifying police officer, would likely result

  • Constantine v. Lenox Instrument Co., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-10-04
    Practice Area: Wrongful Death
    Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Manufacturing
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stabile
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2710 EDA 2022

    Negligence verdict against employer in asbestos exposure case was not against weight of evidence where plaintiff presented sufficient evidence of exposure and employers had a heightened duty to protect employees from known workplace hazards. Orders of the trial court affirmed in part and reversed in part.

  • In re: Estate of Grigg

    Publication Date: 2024-10-04
    Practice Area: Trusts and Estates
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Kunselman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 862 WDA 2023

    Weight of evidence supported trial court's rejection of will where it discredited fact witness evidence regarding execution of the purported will, allowing the trial court to rely on expert testimony opining that the signature was a forgery. Order of the trial court affirmed.

  • PennEnergy Res. LLC v. MDS Energy Dev., LLC

    Publication Date: 2024-10-04
    Practice Area: Energy and Natural Resources
    Industry: Energy | Mining and Resources
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Olson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 132 WDA 2023

    Trial court erred when it held PennEnergy was likely to prevail on the merits regarding its claim that appellant MDS was not a party to the Joint Development Agreement or subject to the JDA's arbitration provision and also erred in granting PennEnergy's motion for preliminary injunction against appellant MDS in action concerning working interests in wellbores. Affirmed and vacated.