• C.G. v. J.H.

    Publication Date: 2017-10-31
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Solano
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1569

    Defendant lacked standing to bring this custody matter against plaintiff, her former same-sex life partner and the biological mother of a minor child, where plaintiff never adopted the child and the evidence demonstrated that plaintiff never stood in loco parentis to the child. The court affirmed an order sustaining defendants preliminary objections.

  • Commonwealth v. McGarry

    Publication Date: 2017-10-31
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Dubow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1608

    The U.S. Supreme Courts holding in Birchfield v. North Dakota did not apply in this case, where defendant refused to submit to breath testing, as opposed to blood testing; however, defendant was entitled to relief on appeal from a trial court order denying his petition under the Post Conviction Relief Act without conducting a hearing. The appellate court vacated and remanded for further proceedings.

  • Kovacevich v. Regional Produce Coop. Corp.

    Publication Date: 2017-10-31
    Practice Area: Occupational Safety and Health
    Industry: Distribution and Wholesale | Food and Beverage
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Solano
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1618

    Trial court properly dismissed appellants claims against wholesale market managing company based on a controlling employer argument derived from an OSHA compliance directive after appellant was injured by a pallet jack driven by his own employee because the policy appellant relied on did not determine rights or obligations or cause legal consequences and concerned only the scope of enforcement of OHSA requirements and managing company had assumed no duty regarding safety in the leased areas of the market

  • In the Interest of H.K.

    Publication Date: 2017-10-31
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stabile
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1611

    Trial court erred in granting parents request for de novo hearing in dependency petition after orphans court had accepted masters report, when parent failed to object to hearing before master and had not shown cause for rehearing, and thus had no right to rehearing before trial judge. Order of the trial court reversed.

  • Commonwealth v. Wilson

    Publication Date: 2017-10-31
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Moulton
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1612

    Motion to suppress statements properly denied where, although defendant was initially illegally detained on an inactive warrant, any taint from the illegal arrest was attenuated where defendant voluntarily waived Miranda rights to make statements in response to co-defendants incriminating statements and evidence obtained from a search warrant thereunder. Judgment of sentence affirmed.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    RICO: Civil and Criminal Law and Strategy

    Authors: Hon. Jed S. Rakoff, Howard W. Goldstein

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • K.M.G. v. H.M.W.

    Publication Date: 2017-10-24
    Practice Area: Evidence | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Strassburger
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1593

    Trial court erred in finding parent in contempt for failure to encourage childs visitation with other parent, where prior orders did not include requirement for parent to encourage the child, and where record demonstrated that parent followed directives of resource center in terminating visits. Order of the trial court reversed and vacated.

  • Krishnan v. The Cutler Group, Inc

    Publication Date: 2017-10-24
    Practice Area: Business Torts | Civil Appeals | Real Estate
    Industry: Construction | Real Estate
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Presiding Judge Bender
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1599

    Trial court correctly found for appellees in their common law fraud, breach of contract, breach of warranties and UTPCPL claims against home builder for defective stucco because the evidence supported the breach of warranties claim, the UTPCPL claim was not time-barred and appellees did not need to prove all the elements of common law fraud to state a claim under the UTPCPL catchall provision but trial court abused its discretion in calculating appellees attorney fees by limiting the award based on the contingency agreement.

  • In Re: J.D.H

    Publication Date: 2017-10-24
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Ott
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1596

    Trial court did not abuse its discretion in changing permanency goal to adoption after only seven months of foster care. Order of the trial court affirmed.

  • In Re: Estate of Easterday, deceased

    Publication Date: 2017-10-24
    Practice Area: Trusts and Estates
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Lazarus
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1594

    Insurance beneficiary designation was not statutorily invalidated due to the pendency of a divorce proceeding between the insured decedent and named beneficiary. Order of the orphans court affirmed.

  • Commonwealth v. Moyer

    Publication Date: 2017-10-24
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stabile
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-1591

    Defendant was not entitled to retroactive application of the holding in Birchfield v. North Dakota, wherein the U.S. Supreme Court held that the criminalization of a suspects refusal to consent to a blood test violates the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, since she failed to challenge the warrantless blood draw at any stage of the litigation prior to a nunc pro tunc post-sentence motion. The appellate court affirmed defendants judgment of sentence.