• J.S. v. Manheim Twp. Sch. Dist.

    Publication Date: 2021-12-06
    Practice Area: Education Law
    Industry: Education
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Todd
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-1410

    Privately communicated offensive online memes did not meet the true threat exception to warrant a student's expulsion, where there was no evidence of the maker's intent to terrorize and where there was no substantial disruption to school operations. Order of the commonwealth court affirmed.

  • Rellick-Smith v. Rellick

    Publication Date: 2021-11-15
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Todd
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-1325

    Superior court erred in affirming trial court's grant of motion to amend answers to include an affirmative defense of statute of limitations, which a prior motion judge had ruled was waived, because the coordinate jurisdiction rule applied and there was no basis for trial judge to disturb motion judge's holding that appellees waived the defense. Reversed and remanded.

  • Commonwealth v. Bradley

    Publication Date: 2021-11-15
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Todd
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-1329

    A criminal defendant was entitled, after obtaining new PCRA counsel, to assert a claim of ineffective assistance of prior PCRA counsel at the first available opportunity following the appearance of new counsel, even while a PCRA petition was on appeal. Judgment of the superior court reversed, case remanded.

  • In the Interest of T.W.

    Publication Date: 2021-11-08
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Mundy
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-1294

    Appellant challenged the standards by which police officers could remove objects detected during a Terry stop and frisk and court found officer could remove the object if he or she had reasonable suspicion the object was a weapon or, if officer determined the object was not a weapon, if it was immediately apparent by touch that the object was illegal contraband. Affirmed.

  • Firearms Owners Against Crime v. Papenfuse

    Publication Date: 2021-11-08
    Practice Area: Constitutional Law
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Mundy
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-1302

    Lawful firearms owners who resided or worked in or regularly traveled to a municipality had standing to challenge municipal ordinances regulating the possession and use of firearms as the active enforcement of the ordinances gave the owners a substantial and immediate interest in determining the legality and constitutionality of the ordinances. Order of the commonwealth court affirmed.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Wrongful Use of Civil Proceedings and Related Torts in Pennsylvania, Second Edition

    Authors: George Bochetto, David P. Heim, John A. O’Connell, Robert S. Tintner

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Apartment Ass'n of Metro. Pittsburgh, Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh

    Publication Date: 2021-11-08
    Practice Area: Government
    Industry: Hospitality and Lodging | Real Estate | State and Local Government
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Wecht
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-1305

    The commonwealth court did not err in finding that the Home Rule Charter and Optional Plans Law's business exclusion precluded a Pittsburgh ordinance that proscribed source-of-income discrimination in Section 8 housing. The high court affirmed.

  • In re: Appeal for Formation of Indep. Sch. Dist. of Borough of Highspire

    Publication Date: 2021-10-25
    Practice Area: Education Law
    Industry: Education | State and Local Government
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Donohue
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-1236

    Secretary of education was entitled to consider financial impacts to proposed independent school district and the existing school districts that students in the independent district would transfer from and to when evaluating a petition from "an educational standpoint." Order of the commonwealth court reversed, case remanded.

  • Trust Under Will of Ashton

    Publication Date: 2021-10-25
    Practice Area: Trusts and Estates
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Saylor
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-1234

    Trust beneficiary entitled to fixed annuity payments had standing from equitable interest in trust corpus to challenge trustee's administration and request for additional compensation. Order of the superior court reversed.

  • Brooks v. Ewing Cole, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2021-10-18
    Practice Area: Premises Liability
    Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Mundy
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-1201

    Claim of sovereign immunity was immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine as sovereign immunity was a protection from suit, not just liability for damages, and therefore would be irreparably lost if public entity were forced to litigate all the way to final judgment to seek appellate review on its immunity claim. Order of the commonwealth court reversed and remanded.

  • K.N.B. v. M.D.

    Publication Date: 2021-10-18
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Wecht
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-1208

    Appellant appealed the grant of a sexual violence protective order and court found petitions under the Protection of Victims of Sexual Violence or Intimidation Act were subject to the six-year catch-all statute of limitations and the continued risk of harm element did not require trial court to evaluate the reasonableness of a plaintiff's mental and emotional reactions. Affirmed.