Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
869 results for '* industry:"Health Care"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2019-05-13
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry: Health Care | Legal Services
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Justice Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Peter Goldberger and Pamela A. Wilk
for defendant: Craig Carpenito, United States Attorney, Mark E. Coyne, John F. Romano, and Steven G. Sanders (Office of United States Attorney)
Case Number: 17-2458
District Court Erred in Limiting Advice-of-Counsel Defense but Conviction Affirmed Due to Overwhelming Evidence of Criminal Intent
Publication Date: 2019-05-13
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry: Health Care
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Saylor
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-0561
Superior court erred in applying New Jersey law and denying plaintiff's equitable claims in its action to recover the costs of care for a disabled New Jersey resident from his parents because Pennsylvania law applied and plaintiff met the requirements for its equitable claims. Reversed.
Publication Date: 2019-05-13
Practice Area: Damages | Medical Malpractice
Industry: Health Care
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
Judge: Judge Nealon
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-0475
Defendant's economic expert was barred from referencing the discount of the infant plaintiff's future life care costs to present value since Pennsylvania case law and §509 of the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error Act do not permit damage awards for future medical expenses to be reduced to present value by the application of a discount factor. The court granted plaintiff's motion in limine.
Publication Date: 2019-05-13
Practice Area: Evidence
Industry: Health Care
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
Judge: Judge Nealon
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-0474
Pursuant to Aldridge v. Edmunds and its progeny, defendant's medical expert could make limited reference to textual materials in explaining the basis for his opinion that, contrary to plaintiff's assertion, the infant plaintiff did not meet the "entry criteria" for initiating certain treatment. The court granted in part and denied in part plaintiff's motion in limine.
Publication Date: 2019-05-13
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry: Health Care
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Cohen
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-0503
Pennsylvania did not recognize tort claims for the negligent handling of a corpse, so the court properly dismissed all of plaintiffs' claims with prejudice. A defendant who did not constitute an aggrieved party did not have standing to appeal an order for summary judgment.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: J. Randolph Evans, Shari L. Klevens, Suzanne Y. Badawi
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2019-05-13
Practice Area: Education Law
Industry: Health Care
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Kearney
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-0563
Defendant university and deans moved for summary judgment in graduate student's action asserting §1983 constitutionally infirm procedural processes in his honor board hearings and state law claims of breach of contract, unjust enrichment and defamation and the court found student failed to adduce sufficient evidence to show bias or that dean manipulated the university disciplinary process, university's Monell liability or for his state law claims. Motion granted.
Publication Date: 2019-05-06
Practice Area: Health Care Law
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Stabile
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-0527
Trial court erred in denying commonwealth's request to inspect rehabilitation clinic's records as to clinic's distribution of methadone to defendant because enforcing the controlled substance, drug, device and cosmetic act would not reveal any potentially incriminating information in the substance of any of defendant's patient records as prohibited by the Pennsylvania drug and alcohol abuse act. Reversed in part.
Publication Date: 2019-05-06
Practice Area: Dispute Resolution
Industry: Health Care
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Colins
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-0523
Trial court erred as a matter of law in finding that appellant had the authority to sign an arbitration agreement on behalf of decedent when he entered nursing home because while appellant had temporary letters of conservatorship, those letters were granted by a California court and no steps were taken for the conservatorship to be recognized in Pennsylvania. Reversed.
Publication Date: 2019-05-06
Practice Area: Wrongful Death
Industry: Health Care
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Linhardt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-0378
In this this suit against a medical facility for a patient's death, plaintiff failed to allege particularized facts regarding the employees or agents involved, and the factual allegations did not support a claim for punitive damages.
Publication Date: 2019-05-06
Practice Area: Elder Law
Industry: Health Care
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Linhardt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-0379
Plaintiff's complaint adequately stated claims for negligence and punitive damages, but the court sustained one preliminary objection because plaintiff had to allege specific facts instead of simply referring to a statute generally.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read