• Commonwealth v. Moose

    Publication Date: 2021-01-18
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Nichols
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-0033

    The trial court properly found that defendant could challenge the application of Pennsylvania's sexual offender registration statute, or SORNA II, outside the framework of the Post-Conviction Relief Act, though defendant was entitled to a hearing on whether his negotiated guilty plea precluded application of the scheme and its possible alteration of his agreed-upon sentence. The superior court vacated and remanded.

  • In the Interest of: D.G.

    Publication Date: 2020-11-30
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Nichols
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20-1294

    Trial court erred in involuntarily terminating parental rights and ordering permanency goal change to adoption for 15-year-old child where child's legal counsel failed to offer any advocacy beyond placing child's preferences on the record and where the record did not clearly demonstrate child's statutorily-required consent to adoption. Order of the trial court vacated, case remanded.

  • Sampathkumar v. Chase Home Fin., LLC

    Publication Date: 2020-11-02
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry: Financial Services and Banking
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Nichols
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20-1196

    Trial court properly granted partial summary judgment in appellants' action alleging trespass, conversion and conspiracy, defendants moved to quash appellants' appeals and court upheld trial court's pretrial rulings, agreed the statute of limitations barred the trespass claims, conspiracy claims failed as a matter of law and quashed the appeals. Judgment affirmed, appeals quashed in part.

  • In the Interest of Y.W.-B.

    Publication Date: 2020-10-19
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Nichols
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20-1139

    Trial court properly found probable cause to compel parents' cooperation in a Department of Human Services home visit and did not apply an improper probable cause standard in ordering parents' compliance since there was a fair probability that children could have been in need of services and evidence relating to that need could have been found inside the home but did err in ordering mother not to record DHS employees acting in their official capacities. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

  • Guiser v. Sieber

    Publication Date: 2020-08-17
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Nichols
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20-0886

    Trial court erred in ordering injunctive relief under a theory of easement by prescription where trial court failed to resolve whether road over which the alleged easement ran was a private road, or a public road that would require the joining of municipalities as indispensable parties. Appeal quashed in part; vacated and remanded in part.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Chester County Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Commonwealth v. LeClair

    Publication Date: 2020-08-10
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Nichols
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20-0849

    The trial court erred in ordering defendant, who murdered his wife, disposed of her body in a lake and told the U.S. Coast Guard that she had fallen overboard, to pay restitution to the Coast Guard because the Coast Guard did not qualify as a "victim" under 18 Pa.C.S. §1106(a). The superior court vacated the restitution portion of defendant's judgment of sentence.

  • Commonwealth v. Lites

    Publication Date: 2020-07-13
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Nichols
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20-0721

    The trial courterred in imposing a mandatory minimum sentenceupon defendant as a second-strike offender of a crime of violence under 42 Pa.C.S. §9714where defendant's 1994 conviction for burglary was not an equivalent offense to his current burglary conviction given the changes in the crime's statutory elements. The superior court remanded for resentencing.

  • Commonwealth v. Lites

    Publication Date: 2020-07-13
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Nichols
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20-0721

    The trial courterred in imposing a mandatory minimum sentenceupon defendant as a second-strike offender of a crime of violence under 42 Pa.C.S. §9714where defendant's 1994 conviction for burglary was not an equivalent offense to his current burglary conviction given the changes in the crime's statutory elements. The superior court remanded for resentencing.

  • Rosiecki v. Rosiecki

    Publication Date: 2020-04-27
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Nichols
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20-0436

    Trial court properly granted wife's motion to dismiss husband's petition to terminate alimony because husband's claims for modification were insufficient as a matter of law since the alimony arose from the parties' agreement, not a court-order, and agreement did not permit judicial modification. Affirmed.

  • In re: The Passarelli Family Trust

    Publication Date: 2020-04-27
    Practice Area: Trusts and Estates
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Nichols
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20-0434

    Court quashed appeal of trial court's denial of application for injunctive relief to preserve status quo where merits case had been appealed to the supreme court, requiring filing the application for injunctive relief with the appellate court. Appeal quashed.