• In re: Estate of W. McAleer

    Publication Date: 2021-04-19
    Practice Area: Discovery
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Wecht
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-0422

    The high court split on whether the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine protect communications between a trustee and counsel from discovery by beneficiaries when the communications arose in the context of adversarial proceedings between those parties, but found that disclosure would nevertheless result from the competing positions set forth by a majority of justices. The high court affirmed the lower court's alternative ruling.

  • Commonwealth v. Mayfield

    Publication Date: 2021-04-05
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry: Legal Services | State and Local Government
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Wecht
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-0365

    Trial court lacked authority to remove district attorney's office for failing to participate in parole revocation hearing and to appoint a private attorney to represent the commonwealth. Order of the trial court vacated, case remanded.

  • Gregg v. Ameriprise Fin. Inc.

    Publication Date: 2021-03-01
    Practice Area: Consumer Protection
    Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Insurance
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Wecht
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-0215

    Violating catch-all provision of the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law by engaging in deceptive conduct constituted strict liability offense, such that consumer's failure to establish fraudulent or negligent behavior in other claims in case did not bar statutory claim. Order of the superior court affirmed.

  • Lamar Advantage GP Co., LLC v. City of Pittsburgh Zoning Bd. of Adjustment

    Publication Date: 2021-02-01
    Practice Area: Administrative Law
    Industry: Advertising | State and Local Government
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Wecht
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-0100

    Lower courts properly upheld changes to billboard sign where owner had an existing legal, non-conforming use and had not sought to change the structure of the billboard, which would require new approvals and permits. Order of the commonwealth court affirmed.

  • Graham v. Check

    Publication Date: 2021-01-18
    Practice Area: Motor Vehicle Torts
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Wecht
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-0035

    Trial court erred in issuing sudden emergency doctrine instruction to the jury where pedestrian's entrance into the intersection with the signal in their favor and proceeding across the intersection at a normal pace meant the driver's failure to observe the pedestrian until it was too late to safely stop meant that any emergency was self-created by the motorist. Order of the superior court reversed, case remanded.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Commonwealth v. Cox

    Publication Date: 2020-11-02
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Wecht
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20-1182

    Trial court erred in concluding analysis of defendant's alleged intellectual disability after finding standardized testing conducted by defendant's experts to be not credible, where determination of intellectual disability was not limited solely to the results of diagnostic testing but could be based on other assessments as well. Order of the trial court reversed, case remanded.

  • Commonwealth v. Small

    Publication Date: 2020-10-19
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Wecht
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20-1132

    Although public record presumption had no statutory basis in the newly-discovered facts statutory exemption to the PCRA time bar, defendant's PCRA petition failed where a commonwealth witness's new testimony was materially consistent with trial testimony. Order of the superior court affirmed.

  • Sivick v. State Ethics Comm'n

    Publication Date: 2020-10-12
    Practice Area: Government
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Wecht
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20-1116

    Commonwealth court erred in finding supervisor's act of approving his son's payroll for work as road crew constituted a conflict of interest because the performance by a public officer of an administrative act entailing no discretion that benefited a subclass that included a family member did not constitute a conflict of interest and court erred in approving commission's imposition of restitution since commission lacked a statutory basis to impose restitution. Reversed and remanded.

  • In re Nomination Paper of Scroggin

    Publication Date: 2020-09-28
    Practice Area: Election and Political Law
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Wecht
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20-1064

    Commonwealth court erred in allowing the submission of a fax of a candidate's purported affidavit, contravened a critical anti-fraud election regulation, erred in excusing the fax's "method of submission" and erred in determining that "substantial compliance" was sufficient to excuse candidate's oversight and the defect was fatal to candidate's nomination and to the substitution of the person nominated at the party's convention. Reversed.

  • Johnson v. Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg, LLP

    Publication Date: 2020-08-31
    Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
    Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Legal Services
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Wecht
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20-0940

    Trial court correctly applied principal amount ceiling of Act 6 in effect at the time of loan origination where there was no indication in the 2008 revision to the act that the legislature intended for the increased ceiling to apply retroactively. Order of the superior court affirmed.