Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Property owner was provided with sufficient notice regarding upset tax sale and judicial tax sale, so the court denied the motion to set aside the sale.
Plaintiffs failed to establish that defendants breached their duty of care where one of the plaintiffs injured her hand and arm when her finger became lodged in the locking system of a door. The court granted defendants motion for summary judgment.
Plaintiff could not maintain a bad faith claim under 42 Pa.C.S. 8371 against the defendant insurance agent since 8371 only governs the conduct of insurers and does not apply to insurance agents and, regardless, the agents actions did not import a dishonest purpose or evince some motive of self-interest or ill-will. The court granted the defendant agents motion for judgment on the pleadings.
The court rejected defendants attempt to strike plaintiffs agency claims for failure to identify defendants actual or ostensible agents by name while also warning the defense bar that the persistent pursuit of such an argument regarding the pleading of agency claims can only serve to delay the progress of litigation and needlessly increase defense costs. The court overruled defendants preliminary objections.
The Reading Township Board of Supervisors reasons for denying applicants request for approval of an intermunicipal transfer of a liquor license pursuant to 47 P.S. 4-461(b.3) were not supported by substantial evidence where there was no objective evidence that granting the request would be contrary to the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the township.
Respondent was suspended for a period of three months because he violated RPC 1.1 and RPC 1.3 by failing to take action in his clients civil case to enjoin a non-judicial eviction for breach of contract.
A former employee failed to state sufficient facts to support a claim for fraud in the inducement where there was no evidence of a false statement or an intent to mislead.
Defendant waived the right to challenge his consent to a blood test that led to charges of driving under the influence by failing to file his motion to suppress in a timely fashion in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Courts decision Birchfield v. North Dakota. The court denied defendants motion to suppress without holding a hearing.