Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Publication Date: 2017-10-17 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Supreme Court Judge:Justice Wecht Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 17-1557
Residential search warrant lacked probable cause where it was unsupported by tailored, individualized facts regarding the subject of the search indicating that evidence relating to the crime would be found at the residence, but such error was harmless where other evidence overwhelmingly established guilt.
Plaintiffs amended complaint sufficiently pled a claim of corporate negligence against the defendant nursing home where the five factors set forth Althaus v. Cohen, as applied here.
The trial courts rulings in a criminal case regarding eyewitness identification, demonstrative evidence and expert testimony were not in error, and defendant was not entitled to relief from the sentence imposed.
Suppression of wiretap evidence not warranted where police adopted reasonable intercept minimization plan requiring monitors to switch off and spot check.
Publication Date: 2017-10-17 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Lazarus Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 17-1559
Detective erroneously permitted to testify as to meaning of street language where not a participant in the conversation, or qualified as an expert.
The district court erred in finding that it lacked federal admiralty jurisdiction over tort claims arising out of a drunken brawl that erupted on a cruise ship docking off the Delaware River.
Breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims arising from retailers termination of rewards program during terms of customers memberships failed where program agreement permitted retailed to alter or terminate the program at any time and stated that membership fees were nonrefundable.
Plaintiffs were required to arbitrate their grievance with their employer in accordance with the terms of the applicable collective bargaining agreement and they could not circumvent this exhaustion-of-remedy requirement in the absence of any allegations of conspiracy between their employer and their union. The court denied plaintiffs motion to stay arbitration.
Workers compensation board erred in reversing the WCJs findings that decedent was on a special assignment for employer when he was killed in an automobile accident because decedent was a traveling employee and on special assignment at the time of the accident.
A volunteer fire company qualified as a local agency for purposes of Pennsylvanias Right to Know Law, and it was required to provide requested meeting minutes and financial documents regarding loan transactions