• Cummins v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review

    Publication Date: 2019-04-29
    Practice Area: Labor Law | Social Media
    Industry: Manufacturing
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Leavitt
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0477

    Claimant committed willful misconduct and was ineligible for unemployment compensation where she made a social media post indicating an intent to cause physical harm upon a co-worker as a result of a confrontation with that co-worker while on duty. Decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirmed.

  • Jones v. Sch. Dist. of Philadelphia

    Publication Date: 2019-04-22
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: Education
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Covey
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0454

    Secretary erred in concluding wrongfully terminated employee had not made reasonable efforts to mitigate damages where employee obtained other work and sought continued education and training during relevant period, and where employer's evidence of alternative work was unsuited to the employee's circumstances. Order of the secretary of education vacated and remanded.

  • Vladimirsky v. Sch. Dist. of Philadelphia

    Publication Date: 2019-04-22
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: Education
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Covey
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0463

    The secretary erred in awarding damages for petitioner's lost compensation after he was improperly terminated as a teacher because petitioner did not fail to mitigate damages as secretary erroneously found, where petitioner sought other teaching jobs until his unemployment ran out, was unsuccessful due to his termination from a tenured position and he then took a security guard position. Order vacated.

  • Li v. Family Garden II, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2019-04-08
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: Food and Beverage
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge Leeson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0398

    Parties requested the court to approve their settlement of plaintiff's action for unpaid overtime wages and the court found the settlement was fair and reasonable and approved it as long as the confidentiality clause was interpreted to allow plaintiff to discuss its terms with friends, family, defendants' employees and individuals not affiliated with the media. Motion granted.

  • Cmty. Coll. of Philadelphia v. Faculty & Staff Fed. of the Cmty. Coll. of Philadelphia

    Publication Date: 2019-04-01
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: Education
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Wojcik
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0355

    The trial court erred in granting the union's preliminary objections on the ground that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction since the statutory provision vesting the Labor Relations Board with exclusive original jurisdiction over unfair labor practices did not divest the court of jurisdiction to entertain this equity action to enjoin a strike. The appellate court reversed and remanded.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice 2024: A Practical Guide

    Authors: KENNETH DEL VECCHIO

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Cmty. Coll. of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Bd.

    Publication Date: 2019-04-01
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Labor Law
    Industry: Education | Recruitment and Staffing
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Wojcik
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0359

    PLRB lacked jurisdiction over public employer's complaint that its full-time employees and their union had engaged in a partial strike following the union's instruction to its members to stop performing mandatory assessments, while still receiving full compensation, since jurisdiction over a claim for relief from a strike lay exclusively with the courts. Order of the PLRB affirmed.

  • Erie Ins. Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

    Publication Date: 2019-03-11
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: Construction | Insurance
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Brobson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0244

    Application for reimbursement from supersedeas fund denied where employer was made to pay medical expense benefits retroactively pursuant to a penalty petition entered after employer unilaterally withheld benefits in violation of the Workers' Compensation Act. Order of the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board affirmed.

  • Chamberlain v. Wyoming County

    Publication Date: 2019-03-04
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Middle
    Judge: District Judge Mannion
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0231

    After-discovered evidence of an employee's misconduct admissible to limit the span of time for a backpay claim where the after-discovered misconduct would have caused the employer to terminate the employee's employment had it known of the misconduct at the time. Motions in limine granted in part and denied in part.

  • Dolison v. SavaSeniorCare Admin. Servs., LLC

    Publication Date: 2019-02-26
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: Health Care | Recruitment and Staffing
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge DuBois
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0199

    Plaintiff lacked Article III standing for alleged violation of the standalone disclosure requirement of the FCRA where plaintiff was aware her employer would run a background check and where the disclosure and consent form, though contained in an employee handbook, accurately described to plaintiff her rights under the FCRA. Defendant's motion to dismiss granted.

  • Parrotta v. Peco Energy Co.

    Publication Date: 2019-02-19
    Practice Area: Civil Rights | Labor Law
    Industry: Energy
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge Kearney
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0188

    Employer moved for summary judgment in employee's action asserting ADA and FMLA retaliation claims after he was fired for a positive drug test where employer sent him to an EAP substance counseling program before terminating him and the court found employee admitted using marijuana, company policy called for termination after a first positive drug test and employee produced no evidence of pretext or that he was disabled or had invoked his rights under the FMLA. Motion granted.