Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
61 results for '* topic:"Securities Litigation"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-11-15
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Retail
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge McHugh
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 24-3638
Court appointed public employee retirement funds as lead counsel over individual stockholder given the fact that the funds' claims were representative of the class and the funds had the resources and experience with securities class actions to zealously prosecute the case. Plaintiffs' motion for appointment as lead plaintiffs and appointment of lead counsel granted.
Publication Date: 2024-08-30
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Industry: Energy | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge McHugh
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-200
Plaintiff pension plans and defendant energy company and affiliated individuals filed cross-motions for summary judgment in plaintiffs' action for securities fraud. The court partially granted and denied the parties' motions, holding in pertinent part that plaintiffs could prove loss causation only as to defendant's misrepresentations regarding the capacity and build-out timeline for a planned pipeline, and no reasonable jury could find loss causation as to defendant's remaining challenged corrective disclosures.
Publication Date: 2024-07-10
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Jordan
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-2776
Defendants appealed the district court's order imposing a preliminary injunction freezing defendants' assets.
Publication Date: 2024-05-31
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Manufacturing | Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Smith
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-8050
Petitioners sought permission to appeal the district court's order granting class certification in plaintiff's action alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 concerning a drug manufacturer's shares that were dual listed on a domestic and an international stock exchange. The court denied the petition, holding that discretionary interlocutory review was not appropriate where petitioners challenged the reach of Rule 10(b) regarding dual-listed securities, which ultimately was a merits rather than a class-certification
Publication Date: 2024-05-06
Practice Area: Corporate Governance | Securities Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Fuentes
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-3027
Plaintiffs, trustees and beneficiaries of various funds, appealed the dismissal of their shareholder derivative action against Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-04-26
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Industry: Federal Government
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Kenney
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-cv-04845
Court declined to dismiss or grant relief from SEC complaint alleging Exchange Act violations where underlying conduct and criminal convictions were undisputedly connected to securities transactions. Defendant's motion to dismiss or for Rule 60(b) relief denied.
Publication Date: 2023-12-18
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Accounting
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Brody
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2:20-cv-03326-AB
German accounting firm moved to dismiss plaintiffs' securities litigation action for lack of specific jurisdiction and court found that while firm's participation in a business meeting with its American counterpart in Pennsylvania showed purposeful availment, plaintiffs failed to demonstrate purposeful availment in relation to the causes of action in the complaint in that meeting. Motion granted.
Publication Date: 2023-11-20
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Investments and Investment Advisory | Software
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Leeson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 5:23-cv-03206-JFL
Class action plaintiff moved for consolidation of litigation, appointment as lead plaintiff, and approval of selection of co-lead counsel. The court granted the motion in its entirety.
Publication Date: 2023-08-14
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Donohue
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 57 MAP 2022
Plain text of Section 401 of Pennsylvania Securities Act contained no language indicating that legislature intended to impose scienter requirement for civil liability, although other provisions of the act allowed defendants to assert lack of knowledge of falsity as an affirmative defense. Order of the superior court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2023-07-17
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Industry: Insurance | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Phipps
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph D. Daley, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, San Diego, CA; Peter S. Pearlman, Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf, Saddle Brook, NJ; Daniel J. Pfefferbaum, Shawn A. Williams, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, San Francisco, CA; Douglas Wilens, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, Boca Raton, FL for appellant.
for defendant: David D. Cramer, Tricia B. O’Reilly, Walsh Pizzi O’Reilly & Falanga, Newark, NJ; Maeve L. O’Connor, Susan R. Gittes, Aasiya F.M. Glover, Debevoise & Plimpton, New York, NY for appellees.
Case Number: 21-1147
Stockholder sufficiently alleged false or misleading corporate statements where life insurance company reported normal or slightly negative mortality experience only weeks prior to announcing massive increase in reserves, and stockholder had confidential internal information indicating the company had already been contemplating increasing reserves.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read