Filter This View

  • Alan Joel Geick, Appellant v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-26
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1734-10

    ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN COUNTYKeasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of

  • Kendrick Levell Tyler, Appellant v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-02-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-02
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1362-10

    Keasler, and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) because it does not contain a complete copy of the opinion of the court

  • Robert L. Hughes v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-02-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-02
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-0029-11

    Keasler, and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.3(b) because the original petition is not accompanied by 11 copies.The peti

  • William Michael Proctor v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-02-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-02
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1213-10

    keasler and hervey, jj., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) , because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of appea

  • Billy Carlon Hathorn v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1101-10

    Keasler, and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.3 (b) and 68.4(i) because the original petition is not accompanied by 11 copie

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Chester County Court Rules 2024

    Authors:

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Jason Miears v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1670-10

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.3(b) and 68.4(i), because the petition is not accompanied by 11 copies and it

  • Porteous v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-05-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-07
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Hervey, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: PD-0684-07

    OPINIONA jury convicted appellant of attempted capital murder of a police officer. We granted discretionary review to address the decision of the court of appeals that appellant was not entitled to

  • Jose Refugio Flores, Appellant v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2012-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-01-11
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1657-11

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i), because the petition does not contain a copy of the opinion of the

  • Dean Robert Cardella v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1669-10

    keasler and hervey, jj., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) , because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of appea

  • Tracy Denise Roberson v. the State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2011-01-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-12
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. PD-1232-10

    Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.ORDERThe petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.5 because the petition exceeds 15 pages.The petition is struck. See Rule of