Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Appellant founded Veritas Inspectors, Inc. and began performing inspection services for appellee, a company providing inspection services to customers in the oil, gas, and energy industries, on a project-by-project basis.
The parties' final decree of divorce included a residential geographic restriction to Bezos County, Montgomery County or a contiguous county imposed upon the mother who was granted the exclusive right to designate the primary residence of the child.
Plaintiffs, as members of the Lipan-Apache Native American Church, filed suit against defendant City of San Antonio, arguing that defendant's development plan for a park prevented them from performing essential religious ceremonies.
Appellant has lived in the U.S. for 30 years, is married to a U.S. citizen and is the father of U.S. citizens; he has spent 17 years attempting to adjust his immigration status.
In 2023, S.B. 1045 created a new Fifteenth Court of Appeals of Texas with exclusive statewide jurisdiction to hear cases involving enumerated categories of cases civil matters brought by or against the State, matters challenging the constitutionality of a state statute or rule and the attorney general is a party to the case and required transfer of pending cases within that exclusive jurisdiction to be transferred to the new court.
Appellees asserted individual whistleblower claims against appellant county, alleging they each suffered adverse employment consequences after reporting violations of law occurring within the constable's office.