Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
R.P. was removed from appellee, his mother, due to her neglectful supervision and was placed by the Department of Family and Protective services with his aunt.
Appellee suffered a severe injury in 2013 while working for appellant. Appellant paid appellee temporary income benefits for 104 weeks after his disability began, then paid him impairment income benefits from May 2015 to January 2021, and supplemental income benefits until 401 weeks from his injury.
Relator, a director for the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, was orally ordered by the trial court to appear in court to explain why unnamed Department employees should not be held in contempt for failing to find appropriate placement and meet the needs of a 17-year-old child under the Department's care.
Respondents challenged petitioner's approval of a protocol revision by the Electric Reliability Council of Texas that set the price of electricity at the regulatory maximum during emergency condition.
Appellant was convicted of the first-degree felony offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child younger than six years old and sentenced to 34 years' imprisonment.
Petitioner Sampson Exploration LLC held oil and gas leases on properties of three different families, the Klorers, the Hooks and the Bordages, that sued petitioner for unpaid royalties owed.
Appellants were found guilty by a jury of possession with intent to distribute one hundred kilograms or more of marijuana. They appealed and a panel, over a dissent, reversed, finding the evidence insufficient.
Respondent, a roofing contractor, challenged the Texas Insurance Code's licensing and dual-capacity regulations for public insurance adjusters, claiming these laws violated their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.