NEXT
Search Results

0 results for ''Litchfield Cavo''

You can use to get even better search results
Appellate Division, Second Department:November 12, 2020
Publication Date: 2020-11-16
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Handdown List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, Second Department:November 12, 2020

Appellate Division, First Department: November 12, 2020
Publication Date: 2020-11-16
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department: November 12, 2020

Appellate Division, Second Department: October 14, 2020
Publication Date: 2020-10-16
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Handdown list released on: October 14, 2020
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, Second Department: October 14, 2020

Appellate Division, Second Department: September 30, 2020
Publication Date: 2020-10-02
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, Second Department: September 30, 2020

Appellate Division, Second Department:September 2, 2020
Publication Date: 2020-09-04
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, Second Department:September 2, 2020

August 19, 2020 | Daily Business Review

COVID-19 Business Interruption Ruling Gives Plaintiffs Lawyers Hope

A Florida lawyer says the plaintiff's bar is "energized" by a federal judge's ruling allowing a lawsuit to go forward against an insurance company for a coronavirus pandemic business interruption claim.
6 minute read
August 19, 2020 | Law.com

Missouri COVID-19 Business Interruption Ruling Gives Plaintiffs Lawyers Hope

To borrow a word from a trial lawyer, the plaintiff's bar is "energized" by a Missouri federal judge's ruling allowing a lawsuit to go forward against an insurance company for a coronavirus pandemic business interruption claim.
6 minute read
August 03, 2020 | The Legal Intelligencer

Sledgehammer Attack Lawsuit Against Walgreens Won't Be Remanded

U.S. District Judge Karen Marston of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied plaintiff Antonye Cruz's motion to remand his lawsuit against Walgreens to the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas where it was originally filed.
3 minute read
Premier Eye Associates, P.C. v. Mag Mutual Insurance Company
Publication Date: 2020-07-23
Practice Area: Insurance Litigation
Industry: Insurance
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Presiding Judge Dillard
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Robert Douglass, (Sites & Harbison, PLLC), Atlanta, Willis Green, (Attorney at Law), Atlanta, Semra Kebede, (Law Offices of W. Bryant Green, III, P.C.), Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Jay Barber, Janis Spillers, (Litchfield Cavo, LLP), Atlanta, for appellee.
Case number: A20A0373

Court affirms summary judgment for an insurer in a coverage dispute when insured party filed lawsuit after 2-year policy limitation period

Premier Eye Associates, P.C. v. MAG Mutual Insurance Company
Publication Date: 2020-07-06
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Contractual Disputes | Insurance Law
Industry: Insurance
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Presiding Judge Dillard
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Robert Douglass, (Sites & Harbison, PLLC), Atlanta, Willis Green, (Attorney at Law), Atlanta, Semra Kebede, (Law Offices of W. Bryant Green, III, P.C.), Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Jay Barber, Janis Spillers, (Litchfield Cavo, LLP), Atlanta, for appellee.
Case number: A20A0373

Insurance Company Did Not Waive Contractual Limitations Period For Filing Suit By Engaging in Misleading Conduct

Resources